• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Artist Ai Weiwei's answer to 81 days in China prison: Profanity-laced heavy metal
  • Recommended: Will China mediate the Israeli-Palestinian peace process?
  • Recommended: 'Get out': Over 1,000 take to the streets in China to protest oil refinery
  • Recommended: Chinese spooked by food scandals take action - by growing it themselves

In Behind the Wall, NBC News correspondents and producers examine events and trends in China, both big and small.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 7
    Dec
    2012
    9:34am, EST

    China Nobel winner Mo Yan likens censorship to airport security

    Jonathan Nackstrand / AFP - Getty Images

    The 2012 Nobel Literature Prize laureate, Mo Yan of China, poses for photographers during a press conference of the 2012 Nobel Literature Prize laureate in Stockholm.

    By Ed Flanagan, NBC News

    BEIJING — When the Swedish Academy selected Chinese writer, Mo Yan, as this year’s recipient of the Nobel Prize for Literature, the move was hailed by the state media, only two years after blasting the same committee for awarding the peace prize to fellow countryman and outspoken dissident Liu Xiaobo.

    However, outside of the country,  some critics pointedly questioning Mo’s Communist Party membership, his unwillingness to speak up for freedom of speech on the mainland and his apparent reluctance to speak out for his fellow laureate. "Giving the award to a writer like this is an insult to humanity and to literature," declared noted Chinese artist and activist, Ai Weiwei, at the time.


    Perhaps sensing the backlash, Mo spoke out the evening his Nobel victory was announced, telling journalists he hoped Liu — who is currently serving an 11-year sentence for his work on a direct call for political liberalization known as Charter 08 — could “achieve his freedom as soon as possible.”

    The supportive words seemed to help give Mo the benefit of the doubt among critics and the foreign press, but comments he gave on Thursday regarding Chinese censorship and Liu’s plight have reinvigorated criticism of the acclaimed writer.


    Follow @NBCNewsWorld

    'The highest principle'
    During an interview in Stockholm, Mo surprisingly defended China’s suppression of free speech, saying that censorship should not prevent the truth, but that rumors and defamation "should be censored."

    "But I also hope that censorship, per se, should have the highest principle," Mo added.

    Mo Yan's Nobel win celebrated -- and panned -- in China

    Mo went on to liken censorship to the airport security he passed through flying to Stockholm.

    "When I was taking my flight, going through the customs ... they also wanted to check me even taking off my belt and shoes," he said. "But I think these checks are necessary."

    Special coverage of China: Behind the Wall on NBCNews.com

    Mo caused further ripples when he told reporters he did not plan to sign an appeal being passed around by his peers calling for the immediate release of Liu and his wife, Liu Xia.

    It has been signed by134 fellow Nobel laureates, including South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

    Always an 'independent'
    Mo explained his unwillingness to sign as a desire to maintain his independence.

    "I have always been independent. I like it that way. When someone forces me to do something, I don't do it," he said.

    For Chinese winner's wife, Nobel is no prize

    Mo’s comments and reticence in voicing support for his compatriot, Liu, was seen as particularly appalling as it came the same day as the publishing of a distressing interview with Liu’s wife, Liu Xia.

    The interview, made possibly only after AP reporters slipped by Chinese security away at lunch, was the first she had given in 26 months and graphically showed the emotional stress of being under home detention since her husband’s imprisonment. 

    China’s reception of Liu Xiabo and Mo Yan’s Nobel victories couldn’t have been any more different.

    While Mo Yan’s award this year has been hailed in state media – despite many of his books being censored in China – Liu’s victory was roundly rejected by Beijing.

    In a statement issued by the foreign ministry soon after the 2010 announcement, the government wrote that Liu’s victory "runs completely counter to the principle of the prize and is also a blasphemy to the peace prize.”

    27 comments

    I love how in the same article Mo Yan is quoted as espousing the benefits of censorship and declaring himself an independent spirit. This is your Nobel prize winner for literature.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: china, nobel, author, censorship, featured, ai-weiwei, liu-xiaobo, mo-yan
  • 12
    Oct
    2012
    9:07am, EDT

    Mo Yan's Nobel win celebrated -- and panned -- in China

    Wang Wei / EPA

    Nobel Prize-winning writer Mo Yan holds a press conference in his hometown of Gaomi, in China's Shandong province, on Friday.

    By Ed Flanagan, NBC News

    BEIJING -- State media gave the official stamp of approval Friday over the decision to award the Nobel Prize for literature to Chinese novelist Mo Yan, giving him front-page coverage across the country.

    The warm coverage of the award is unsurprising considering the prestige and recognition that China's ruling Communist Party will collectively bask in as a result.

    But in another sense, the warm reception for the awarding is striking considering the anger and hysteria drummed up by Beijing following the 2010 awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to imprisoned political dissident, Liu Xiaobo.


    In the two years that have followed Liu’s win, which was heavily censored in state media, China has maintained a chilly relationship with the Nobel committee and its home country of Norway. Meetings with Norwegian ministers and trade delegations have been canceled and important talks regarding the eventual opening of the Arctic Sea route have been halting.

    China even went so far as to develop its own ill-fated peace prize, while exports of Norway’s famed salmon fell victim to the frigid political atmosphere between the two countries.

    China’s first Nobel-winning writer?
    But Mo’s victory seems to have thawed the relationship long enough for China to celebrate the writer, who state media has hailed as the country’s first winner of the prize.


    Follow @NBCNewsWorld

    "This is the first Chinese writer who has won the Nobel Prize for Literature," gushed China’s People’s Daily newspaper. "Chinese writers have waited too long, the Chinese people have waited too long."

    But critics of the Communist regime point out that Gao Xingjian, who won in 2000 in part for his critical writing of the government, was China’s first winner of the Nobel for literature. He had been exiled to France by the time the prize was awarded.

    Mo Yan, which means "don't speak," is actually a pen name. The 57-year-old Mo's real name is Guan Moye.

    Mo has been favorably compared to American author William Faulkner and is perhaps best known in the West for his 1987 book, Red Sorghum. That book heavily relied on his experience growing up in a farming community in China's northeastern province of Shandong.

    That honest connection to the rural experience has been a central thread through much of Mo’s writing, according to Dai Wei, a professor of literature at China’s Jinan University.

    Special coverage of China: Behind the Wall on NBCNews.com

    "Mo's topics are typically about rural life and his own life experiences, his stories are very close parallels to the real circumstances he lived through," Dai told NBC News. "He often writes about suffering. ... Some people think he glorifies suffering for Westerners, but everything he writes is based on real experience."

    'The dark side of society and the ugliness of human nature'
    Mo latest book, Frog, tells the dark story of a midwife who enthusiastically goes about her work enforcing China’s family-planning laws through forced abortions and sterilizations. The story, a searing critique of China’s one-child policy, won China’s Mao Dun Literature Prize last year.

    "A writer should express criticism ... at the dark side of society and the ugliness of human nature, but we should not use one uniform expression," Mo said in a speech at the 2009 Frankfurt Book Fair.

    Chinese author Mo Yan wins Nobel Prize in literature

    But despite the critical and popular acclaim and Mo’s willingness to confront sensitive social issues in China, Mo’s victory has not come without criticism.

    “Giving the award to a writer like this is an insult to humanity and to literature,” declared noted Chinese artist and activist, Ai Weiwei to the British newspaper The Independent. "It’s shameful for the committee to have made this selection which does not live up to the previous quality of literature in the award."

    Ai’s diatribe toward Mo appears to be rooted in part to his work on a book last year to celebrate the 70th anniversary of a speech given by Mao Zedong.

    More book reviews and news on TODAY.com

    Mao’s speech, known as the "Speech at Yan’an Forum on Art and Literature" set the guidelines for appropriate subject matter for Chinese writers and artists of that revolutionary period, calling upon them to focus on and espouse the merits of Communism and threatening punishment to those who did not bend to the will of the party.

    Mo Yan and around 100 other Chinese writers and artists hand-copied paragraphs from the speech for the book.

    Criticism
    That act, in conjunction with Mo’s position as vice chairman of the government-backed Chinese Writer’s Association, which has failed to voice support toward fellow writer Liu Xiaobo’s Nobel Peace Prize victory, has raised the ire of artists like Ai who wonder just how committed Mo Yan is to free expression.

    Complete Asia-Pacific coverage on NBCNews.com

    After all, critics argue, if a Nobel Prize-winning author with a leadership position in the national writing guild fails to stand up for a fellow artist, then who will?

    Not fair, said professor Dai.

    "I don’t agree with Ai Weiwei, it's just his personal opinion," said Dai. "People have different values, so they evaluate people differently. I think Mo Yan is a great author and Mo Yan is prized by the Nobel Prize council."

    Perhaps sensing the backlash against him, Mo spoke out Friday afternoon from his hometown. Mo told reporters he hoped that Liu Xiaobo "can achieve his freedom as soon as possible." He also noted that he had read Liu’s literary criticisms from the 1980s and that the dissident had the right to research his "politics and social system."

    Complete World coverage on NBCNews.com

    Other supporters of Mo have also came to his defense, noting that many of his books have been banned in China and that the Nobel victory will help put Chinese literature on the map.

    But few believe that the victory will help put Liu Xiaobo back on the map in China, where his victory is still not acknowledged by the government. Liu’s name and the term "Nobel Peace Prize" remain blocked terms on China’s twitter-like service, Weibo.

    Just this week, a BBC report on Liu’s imprisonment noted that the activist and his wife, who remains under illegal house arrest, have been facing extraordinary pressure to accept exile from China in exchange for their freedom.

    NBC News' Johanna Armstrong and Yanzhou Liu contributed to this report.

    More world stories from NBC News:

    • Pakistan: 3 arrested over teen peace activist shooting
    • Seven British marines arrested in Afghanistan murder probe
    • Hezbollah admits launching drone over Israel
    • Indonesia's Bali recalls horror of bombs 10 years on
    • Tunisian magazine teaches children how to build a Molotov cocktail
    • Video: Australian PM launches attack on ‘sexist’ opponent

    Follow World News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook


    7 comments

    At least it was awarded for something the writer actually wrote as opposed to a peace prize for campaign promises.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: china, nobel, literature, beijing, featured, ai-weiwei, gao-xingjian, liu-xiaobo, ed-flanagan, mo-yan
  • 7
    Oct
    2011
    6:41am, EDT

    For Chinese winner's wife, Nobel is no prize

    A year since Chinese activist Liu Xiaobo was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, his wife is still living under house arrest. See an interview with her from days before her husband was awarded the prize, she has not been seen in public since.

    By Adrienne Mong

    BEIJING—A year ago today, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Liu Xiaobo, a writer and activist imprisoned in a northeastern Chinese prison.

    Today he remains in jail for the crime of “inciting subversion of state power,” serving out an 11-year sentence.

    His wife, Liu Xia, remains under unofficial house arrest in Beijing for no crime.


    A slender 51-year old poet and photographer, Liu has been cut off from the rest of the world ever since it was announced her husband would be given the prize.  She has no phone or Internet access, is under constant police watch, receives the rare visit from family members, and seldom is able to venture out.

    “Liu Xia…leads a lonely and oppressed life," the wife  of another dissident was quoted as saying in a profile of Liu. 

    NBC News interviewed Liu Xia in September 2010, just days before her husband won the Nobel Peace Prize.  She was skeptical that the Nobel committee would award Xiaobo the prize.  She described his mood as being good and his outlook as optimistic.  She remembered having premonitions when she read his manifesto for political reform--Charter 08--knowing he would go to prison for writing it.  She talked about the possibility of traveling to Prague for an exhibition of her photographs.

    She appeared composed, bright, and alert.

    But that time seems a world away today.  Liu has not been seen or heard in public since.

    Her treatment is, sadly, not unique.

    The Chinese government has taken a hard line against dissenting voices.  Another example widely cited is Chen Guangcheng, a blind lawyer and activist who has been beaten several times and had his property destroyed or confiscated.  His wife and daughter have also been subjected to unofficial house arrest.

    Again, neither the wife nor daughter are guilty of any crime.  Yet, as one commentator in China observed this week, “[T]he Chinese government are detaining a six-year old girl.”

    30 comments

    Remember when we wouldn't do business with countries having 'human rights' abuses? Now they own our soul and our jobs.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: china, nobel, dissidents, chen-guangcheng, adrienne-mong, liu-xiaobo, liu-xia
  • 9
    Dec
    2010
    7:01am, EST

    Big PR goof? China's confusing Confucius prize

    By Ed Flanagan, NBC News

    BEIJING – In a corner of a cramped conference room that played host to the awarding of the First Confucius Peace Prize, two small children milled around in a corner playing a game with a small crystal trophy that ended up being the actual Confucius prize itself.

    Had the two looked up, they probably would have far more enjoyed the game being played out around them.

    In what will probably go down as one of the worst PR disasters for China in some time, the assembled jurors for the Confucius Peace Prize – some of whom had only been selected a few days before – awarded the prize to former Taiwanese vice-president Lien Chan, who through his spokesman claimed he had never heard of the prize and had no intention of ever picking up the award. 

    Lien perhaps feared the skewering that popular Taiwanese animated news company, Next Media, gave him just yesterday:

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

     

    The jury, receiving the award in Lien’s absence noted, ““We are here to collect the prize on behalf of Grandpa Lien Chan!” to a smattering of applause from staffers inside.

    The assembled media, already skeptical of a prize announced only 3 weeks before and conveniently awarded the day before the Nobel Peace Prize, had many of their suspicions confirmed by the official “Confucius Peace Prize Jury Announcement,” which seemed rushed and virulent in its opinion of the Nobel Prize and its Norwegian origins:     

    China is a symbol of peace, meanwhile it owns the absolute power to uphold peace. With over 1 billion people, it should have a greater voice on the issue of world peace. In essence, Norway is only a small country with scarce land area and population, but it must be in the minority in terms of other relatively large numbers concerning the conception of freedom and democracy. Hence, the selection of the “Nobel Peace Prize” should open [sic] to the people in the world instead of engaging in “minority” type of the [sic] so-called presumption. Because it is unable to stand on the highest point of the whole human being, but also difficult to represent the viewpoint of most people, which could be inevitably biased and fallacious.

    As the jurors stressed, China had reconstructed the “Peace Prize” with Chinese characteristics. However, according to them, none of this had anything to do with jailed dissident, Liu Xiaobo.

    In fact, the jurors initially were reluctant to even say Liu’s name aloud, preferring euphemisms that referred to the Chinese characters that composed his name.

    In responding to one question regarding Liu, a juror cautiously said, “Everything and every detail we do at the Confucius Peace Prize, has nothing to do with the Three Characters [Liu Xiaobo] you just mentioned.”

    The amusing names brought levity to some otherwise serious questions posed to the jurors regarding the detention of Liu Xiaobo, the timeline surrounding the creation of the Confucius Prize, the origins of the 100,000 yuan ($15,000) prize and the co-opting of an important Chinese philosopher in the name of political gamesmanship with the West.

    As the press conference went on, hard feelings amongst the jurors regarding the criteria for the Nobel Peace Prize and its past winners started to seep out.

    In particular, jurors were keen to discuss China’s peaceful history and rise as compared to the West. Even providing a history lesson as one noted that acclaimed 16th century Chinese admiral and eunuch, Zheng He, “sailed much of the world and never colonized anyone.”

    President Barack Obama’s win last year was also mentioned as an example of the hypocrisy of the prize as jurors expressed outrage that someone who presided over two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could be nominated to win a peace prize.

    Whether there is another Confucius Peace Prize next year will certainly be a topic of intense discussion in the coming months. To be sure, a ceremony next year will almost certainly be cleaned up and this rare, it's unlikely this uncensored commentary on Sino-western relations will ever be repeated again.

    However, that isn’t to say that the sentiments expressed today won’t be felt down the line. As one juror confidently noted toward the end, “In 500 years, history will be on our side!”

    104 comments

    Confucius say "Receiving new Peace Prize is like Chinese takeout- 2 hours later you're empty again"

    Show more
    Explore related topics: human-rights, china, nobel-prize, featured, liu-xiaobo, ed-flanagan, next-media
  • 3
    Nov
    2010
    5:38am, EDT

    NGO honors '89 Tiananmen general with own peace prize

    BEIJING – In early October as the Nobel Prize Committee prepared to announce this year’s recipients, Chinese blogs and web portals breathlessly updated netizens with news on potential nominees and winners.

    So it was all the more startling to see the silence that followed after Liu Xiaobo was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The head of the Nobel prize committee hailed him as "the foremost symbol" of the human rights struggle in China.

    Perhaps in response to the honor that the Chinese government dubbed as an “attack” by the West on Chinese values and power, Beijing announced late last week in the local Chinese press that General Chi Haotian, a former Chinese Defense Minister had received a “World Harmony Award.”

    The award was given by a senior United Nations official on behalf of the World Harmony Foundation (WHF), a non-governmental group founded by mainland born businessman Frank Liu.

    Chi, a former Chinese Defense Minister, is maybe better known as a commander responsible for the People Liberation Army’s harsh response to the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations.

    Foreign Policy’s “Turtle Bay” took a closer look at General Chi’s role in the massacre, as well as the financial ties between the WHF and the United Nations that paved the way for a senior U.N. official, Sha Zukang, to be the one who awarded the prize.

    Sha’s role has generated the most interest among China watchers. It is still unknown how or why Sha, a senior Chinese staff member to Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, was there to present the award to General Chi.

    Ban’s office was reportedly unaware of Sha’s involvement in the ceremony, fueling speculation that Sha could have been involved in nationalist activities in an unofficial U.N. capacity or rewarding the WHF, which had previously donated money to the United Nations.

    A visit to the World Harmony Foundation website reveals no mention of the World Harmony Award or the organization’s Chinese roots.

    To the naked eye, the WHF’s apolitical, neutral, and all inclusive manifesto would appear to be the very definition of a non-governmental organization. However, seen through the prism of its Chinese origins, the WHF appears to be another cog in China’s growing “soft power” mechanism.

    Thanks to Danwei.org for the original link.

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: human-rights, world-news, tiananmen, 1989, liu-xiaobo, ed-flanagan
  • 8
    Oct
    2010
    2:03pm, EDT

    In China, citizens find ways to learn of Nobel prize

    By NBC News’ Eric Baculinao and Bo Gu

    BEIJING – The news that jailed Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize created a lot of excitement among the foreign media here.

    One of their first ports of call Friday was a housing compound in a back alley near China’s Ministry of National Defense in the western part of Beijing, hoping to see and hear from his wife, Liu Xia.

    Mike Clarke/AFP/Getty Images

    Near the China Liason Office in Hong Kong, where Chinese residents have greater freedom of speech than mainland China, protestors celebrate Liu Xiaobo being awarded the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday.

    But after a couple of hours of waiting – and some scuffles with Chinese security personnel – it dawned on the crowd that there would be no appearance by Liu Xia. “No, she cannot come out,” said, Liu Xiaoquan, Liu Xiabo’s younger brother, a hint that authorities were taking preventive measures.

    Which, indeed, they did. After several hours of a semi-standoff, Liu Xia was taken from her home by plainclothes police officers.

    “They are forcing me to leave Beijing," she told Reuters during a phone interview as plainclothes police waited for her outside.

    Preventive measure also were being taken by the government-controlled media.

    China Central TV’s 7 p.m. national newscast reported on Prime Minister Wen Jiabao’s trip to Europe, the status of China’s eleventh iteration of the “Five-Year-Plan” for the economy (the first version began after the revolution in 1949) and the successful artificial insemination of a panda that lead to the birth of two panda cubs in Spain – but not a word on Liu Xiaobo was mentioned.


    Actually, up until Friday, many Chinese people had never even heard Liu Xiaobo’s name before – because his political writings are considered to be subversive by the government, his name has long been censored from the media.

    Soon after the Nobel announcement, major Chinese Web portals like Sina, Netease and Sohu all redirected their previous special reports on this week’s Nobel prizes to their homepages or simply displayed a message saying “deleted.” And reports on the Peruvian writer Vargas Llosa winning the Nobel Literature Prize were demoted on web site homepages and buried among hundreds of other headlines. China Mobile users also found it impossible to send out any text messages mentioning “Liu Xiaobo.”

    Hong Kong-based Phoenix TV did report on the award, but in the context of the foreign ministry’s condemnation of the honor.

    And broadcasts of CNN and BBC, which are usually available in upscale hotels and places where foreigners gather, were blacked out when the Nobel announcement was made and during subsequent reports on the award.

    ‘Finally this day has arrived!’
    Despite the government-controlled media blackout, the Chinese blogosphere and microblogs still exploded with excitement as soon as the news came out that Liu had been awarded the prize.

    On Twitter, the popular web site that can only be accessed via proxy servers in China, it seemed like almost every tweet was about Liu winning the honor.
    “I’m in ecstasy,” wrote Wang Dan, a prominent student leader at the Tiananmen Square protests in Beijing in 1989 who now lives in the U.S. “Finally this day has arrived!”

    Reports on dinner celebrations and firecrackers popping in major cities spread online and there were more than a few tweets from people saying they had shed tears in exhilaration at the news.

    There were also sarcastic comments making the rounds, too. “The Nobel Committee must be broke! So they are giving the award to someone who cannot come to get his money!” or “Congratulations to Chinese judges who sent Liu Xiaobo to prison! They just won the Nobel Shame Prize!”

    Outside the Twitter world, under the surveillance of the government’s censorship, Netizens still found ways to express joy and anger about the government’s response to the award. One person wrote, “Good new, good news, Chinese! You know what I mean!”

    And on Douban.com, another popular Chinese Web portal, a user named “Chengcheng” simply posted links to reports on the win from the world’s major newspapers with Liu Xiaobo’s photo and wrote, “He’s in the headlines of all these media” without writing Liu’s name.

    His post was followed by comments from other users who didn’t mention Liu’s name, but pointed out the constant struggle with censorship. “Yeah he’s on headlines of English media, but not on Chinese ones,” one person wrote. Another wrote, “Last year everyone talked about Obama winning Nobel, this year…nothing.”

    Another stop in a long journey
    The prize was clearly a big boost for China’s dissident community, which has been largely harassed and marginalized by China’s economic achievements and dramatic rise on the global stage.

    Qi Zhiyong, who lost a limb during the 1989 armed crackdown at Tiananmen Square, said the prize was “a confirmation and promotion of Chinese struggle for democracy.” He quickly added, “but it also means we have to redouble our efforts to realize that day,” he said.

    Peking University professor Xia Yeliang, who co-signed the controversial Charter 08 manifesto that led to Liu’s imprisonment, boldly declared to a group of foreign journalists that “the one-party dictatorship will be ended within ten years.”

    For Liu himself, the prize marks the culmination of a long journey that began in the late spring of 1989. He cut short his fellowship at Columbia University in New York to join the historic pro-democracy movement at Tiananmen Square.

    The Tiananmen movement was “teaching China’s government on how to govern in the ways of democracy and rule of law,” he declared in a manifesto that led to a hunger strike in June 1989.

    Nearly 20 years later, he was still promoting the same message. “The awakening Chinese citizens increasingly recognize that freedom, equality and human rights are universal values and that democracy, a republic, and constitutionalism are the hallmarks of modern governance,” declared the Charter 08 manifesto that Liu helped compose in 2008. That document eventually led to an 11-year prison sentence.

    “He has never thought of giving up, and I cannot persuade him to stop,” his wife told NBC News before the news of the Nobel award.

    “You only have one life, so I let him do what he wants to do,” she added.

    117 comments

    US, by turning blind eyes to the evil government and actively pursuing the financial profit from their cheap labor, effectively empowered the evil kingdom.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: china, nobel-peace-prize, featured, liu-xiaobo, eric-baculinao, bo-gu

Browse

  • china,
  • featured,
  • ed-flanagan,
  • adrienne-mong,
  • bo-gu,
  • world-news,
  • beijing,
  • human-rights,
  • eric-baculinao,
  • north-korea,
  • chen-guangcheng,
  • u-s,
  • economy,
  • ai-weiwei,
  • asia,
  • ian-williams,
  • bo-xilai,
  • environment,
  • tibet,
  • communist-party,
  • behind-the-wall,
  • hong-kong,
  • world,
  • xi-jinping,
  • updated,
  • shanghai,
  • one-child-policy,
  • internet,
  • censorship,
  • gu-kailai,
  • protest,
  • weibo,
  • asia-pacific,
  • activist,
  • us,
  • hacking,
  • apple,
  • pollution,
  • taiwan,
  • military,
  • wen-jiabao,
  • corruption,
  • scandal
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Behind The Wall

Behind the Wall provides a dynamic look at China by examining news events and trends – both big and small – from NBC News correspondents and producers. Learn about China's developing economy, politics and the cultural trends that move its 1.3 billion people.

Ed Flanagan

is a Beijing-based producer for NBC News. In China since 2005, he has been a part of the team's China as well as regional news coverage.

Ed Flanagan Blogroll

  • Michael Pettis
  • James Fallows
  • China Law Blog
  • Silicon Hutong
  • Sinica Podcasts
  • China Digital Times
  • The China Beat
  • China Geeks
  • NBC World Blog
  • China Hush

Adrienne Mong

has covered China for NBC News since 2007.

Adrienne Mong Blogroll

  • WorldBlog
  • China Digital Times
  • WSJ China Real Time Report
  • Letter From China
  • Caixin
  • Danwei
  • Forbes Asia Gady Epstein
  • Shanghaiist
  • Shanghai Scrap

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (8)
    • April (7)
    • March (11)
    • February (16)
    • January (9)
  • 2012
    • December (6)
    • November (15)
    • October (12)
    • September (18)
    • August (11)
    • July (13)
    • June (12)
    • May (22)
    • April (17)
    • March (16)
    • February (20)
    • January (13)
  • 2011
    • December (13)
    • November (17)
    • October (10)
    • September (13)
    • August (13)
    • July (14)
    • June (21)
    • May (12)
    • April (10)
    • March (12)
    • February (22)
    • January (18)
  • 2010
    • December (20)
    • November (36)
    • October (6)
    • September (3)
    • August (2)
    • July (4)

Most Commented

  • Will China mediate the Israeli-Palestinian peace process? (328)
  • Artist Ai Weiwei's answer to 81 days in China prison: Profanity-laced heavy metal (4)

Other blogs

  • Daily Nightly
  • The Maddow Blog
  • The Last Word
  • Hardblogger
  • First Read
  • World Blog
  • Field Notes
  • Inside Dateline
  • Behind the Wall
  • The Ed Show
  • Morning Joe
  • Daily Rundown

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • World news on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise