'Worst' smog ever hitting Beijing, environmentalists say

In Beijing, the smog is hazardous. ITV's Angus Walker reports.

BEIJING — Air quality in Beijing was the "worst on record" on Saturday and Sunday, according to environmentalists, with pollution 30-45 times above the recommended safety levels.

With a thick smog wrapping the Chinese capital since Friday, the city's pollution monitoring center warned the city's 20 million residents to stay indoors.


Data posted on Sunday by the monitoring center showed particulate matter measuring less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) had reached more than 600 micrograms per square metre at some monitoring stations in Beijing, and was as high as 900 on Saturday evening.

The recommended daily level for PM2.5 is 20, according to the World Health Organisation. Such pollution has been identified as a major cause of asthma and respiratory diseases.

"This is really the worst on record not only from the official data but also from the monitoring data from the U.S. embassy — some areas in (neighboring) Hebei province are even worst than Beijing," said Zhou Rong, climate and energy campaigner at Greenpeace.

The Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center said heavy pollution had been trapped by an area of low pressure, making it harder to disperse, and the conditions were likely to last another two days.

Related: Beijing's pollution could cut 5 years off life span

Pollution has been identified as one of the biggest challenges facing China's leaders, with outgoing president Hu Jintao saying during his address to the Communist Party Congress last November that the country needed to "reverse the trend of ecological deterioration and build a beautiful China."

China said at the end of last year that it would begin releasing hourly pollution data for its biggest cities.

Beijing has already committed to a timetable to improve air quality in the city, and has relocated most of its heavy industry, but surrounding regions have not made the same commitments, said Zhou.

"For Beijing, cleaning up will take a whole generation but other regions don't even have any targets to cut coal burning. I bet the pollution here is mainly from those surrounding regions." 

 

Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4

This is one more legacy of the insane but still-venerated Mao, who paid a bounty for dead English sparrows, which he regarded as vestiges of China's imperialist past. The birds conrolled the insect population of the Gobi desert, but soon were eradicated. The proliferating insects polished off the grass that tied down the soil. The wind blows, and the resulting dust storms now engulf China. I have watched sun spots with the naked eye from 20,000 feet, so dense is the pollution.

  • 3 votes
Reply#28 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:04 AM EST

But..but.. liberals want central planners to pick and choose environmental laws and regulations. You mean to tell me a bureaucrat won't be able to protect the environment but might actually make it worse?? Absurd!

  • 2 votes
#28.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:21 AM EST
Reply

To those who say too many people, Do us a favor then and exit asap, help the rest of us out a little!

    Reply#29 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:14 AM EST

    I say there are to many.

    Do you want me to kill myself?

    Is that your wish?

    Only an idiot would think the world doesn't have to many people.

      #29.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:25 AM EST
      Reply

      Is this why the U.S. gave its manufacturing sector to china, to be clean and green?

      • 2 votes
      Reply#30 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:19 AM EST

      China, and the U.S. don't need environmental laws, they just need property rights. Coal companies shouldn't be able to dump their wastes into the air which then lands on our property. Our neighbor can't dump a bag of trash in our yard and courts need to enforce the same laws on coal companies to keep them from dumping their wastes on all our yards. Public defense attorneys need to protect public waterways and land from dumping as well.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#31 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:19 AM EST

      I have a way to fix their pollution. Maybe the USA can go back to making our own stuff, then China wouldn't need as many factories.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#32 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:22 AM EST

      second that

      • 2 votes
      #32.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:32 AM EST

      Amen.

      • 2 votes
      #32.2 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:24 PM EST
      Reply

      Well, you want to pollute, now you have to live in it.

      Have fun with that.

        Reply#33 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:26 AM EST

        Yep. They got all the jobs. They got all the pollution. Killing them with 'opportunity'.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#34 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:36 AM EST

        do you actually believe the U.S. is its own planet and what others do wont affect us? so naive.

        • 1 vote
        #34.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:42 AM EST

        Before you start slinging naive...you better back peddle through our own history. Do you recall what was the pollution in the US before the manufacturing was exported??? Remember the rivers that would burn?? LA was a brown cloud. Hell, even Denver had a brown cloud - right smack in all the pristine wilderness. St. Louis was down-right nasty from all the industry there.

        And when the laws got a bit tight here in the US - our wonderful Corps didn't clean up their act....they just sent it somewhere out of our site AND jurisdiction.....and they made better profits doing so with slave labor.

        The Chinese people fell for it hook line and sinker - just like we did.

        Now...who did it to who first?

        • 2 votes
        #34.2 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:50 AM EST

        oh yes, i remember....i remember the environmental scientist admitting in their emails that they fudged their numbers on their findings.

        oh yes, i remember.

        • 1 vote
        #34.3 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:03 AM EST

        Well, aren't you just precious with your witty one-liners?

        OUR pollution was before 'email'.

        What a punk.

          #34.4 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:05 AM EST

          climate change, global warming or whatever you want to call it, was before man.

          • 2 votes
          #34.5 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:50 AM EST

          Which country still uses slaves?

            #34.6 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:29 AM EST
            Reply

            sooo odd, they say the pollutants are killing the planet, but human life expectancy has increased.

            hmmm

            • 2 votes
            Reply#35 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:45 AM EST

            The U.S. gave Communist China and India a pass with the Kyoto Protocol, we are restricting coal usage for power generation here but now exporting coal to China and India. The EPA must think the Chinese atmosphere ends with their border, can't burn it here and the need to switch to cleaner fuels but we can sell it to China and India that have no EPA to speak of. Oh well! 7 billion people going to 10 in a few short years, it is time for a great thinning of the herd. No natural predators so we will take ourselves out. The corporations and major industrialized countries are hoping the thinning will all be in the third world. Mother nature however does not discriminate, get ready for one hell of a ride!

            • 1 vote
            Reply#36 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:59 AM EST

            looks like a slc utah inversion.

              Reply#37 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:02 AM EST

              This is what fueled China's economic boom. Burning coal for cheap electricity with zero investment for environmental controls. I imagine the ground and water are treated the same. The problem with air pollution is that after a while it affects the rest of the world. The coal being shipped from America and Australia should have a inversly directed pollution tax attached to each ton of coal. shipped over there. China is not a developing nation and should be treated like Europe and North America.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#38 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:09 AM EST

              China creates more pollution in one day than most of the active volcanoes on this planet. China also has a craving for rhinoceros horn, elephant tusks, black bear gall bladders and shark fins, all of which are endangered and prohibited for sale or transport from every country in the world. China is the largest threat to security on the planet (right behind Russia and Iran) and China could disarm North Korea if they wanted, but they keep the Kim regime supplied with materials to make nukes so the US will pay more attention to them than to China. China has destroyed more environmentally sensitive land than any other country in the world even has in their drive for power and money. I say let's just allow them to breathe their own pollution until China gets a corner on the lung cancer market and most of them die.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#39 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:14 AM EST

              Or,,,,,,,,, we could all try to work together to solve our problems.

              China has done many things to try to solve some of these problems.

              Subways, high speed rail. 3 Gorges Dam, the ONE CHILD RULE.

              They still have a long way to go.

                #39.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:42 AM EST
                Reply

                That is one scary picture too look at.

                This is what the world is going to look like in all metropolis areas one day soon.

                Can you just imagine another 150 years from now?

                I am glad that I will be long gone from this place before that day comes, but feel sorry for my children's kids.

                They will have to live in this air sludge one day.

                What a mess we have left for them too inherit.

                It is a very sad world they will live in.

                  Reply#40 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:15 AM EST

                  yes it is...now go jump in your car and use up some of that gas.

                  • 1 vote
                  #40.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:53 AM EST

                  Using gas is O K .

                  Wasting gas is bad.

                    #40.2 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:39 AM EST
                    Reply

                    I am a polluter in China and India. My US factory is 90% shut down because it is too environmentaly friendly. It takes my US factory about 1 1/2 years to produce 1 tractor trailer of hazmat when in full operation. In Massachusetts we are only allowed by law to store hazmat for 6 months or face severe fines. The waste hauler will only pick up full trailer loads from our location. The only solution to stay in business was to move production to China and India where less technologically advanced systems are used creating polution which they just dump in their air/water etc. The EPA/DEP has no interest in reducing pollution, only in generating fines to justify their internal empires.

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#41 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:15 AM EST

                    THANK YOU !!

                      #41.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:51 AM EST

                      They sound like OSHA.

                      Mandated to fine companies 50% of the time.

                        #41.2 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:36 AM EST
                        Reply

                        It's no wonder the kids stay inside their factories and play.................I mean work.

                          Reply#42 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:59 AM EST

                          And to think that our Right-wing and Plutocrates think we need fewer environmental regulations.

                            Reply#43 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:18 AM EST

                            Who cares about Pluto? We need to fix Earth first.

                            • 1 vote
                            #43.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:34 AM EST
                            Reply

                            What would Mao do?

                              Reply#44 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:22 AM EST

                              He would kill 50 million and reduce energy use.

                              • 1 vote
                              #44.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:33 AM EST
                              Reply

                              Meanwhile, Xi Jinping is promising that there is a car in every citizen's future.

                                Reply#45 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:27 AM EST

                                If you saw Chinese traffic you would know this is a means of population control.

                                Every time you get a cab you are risking your life.

                                • 1 vote
                                #45.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:32 AM EST
                                Reply

                                there is a glut of manfactured stuff. too many factories, too many choices. pump out the products, then throw them away. then the next generation rebuys the newer version of same items, then throws them away. total insanity. hope china is taking rising health and environmental costs into consideration. billions of people with lung problems don't die quickly. china's pollution is the world's pollution.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#46 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:46 AM EST

                                What's sad is that mankind has already suffered and learned from this mistake, here in America.

                                Why, with our knowledge would this ever happen again anywhere in the world is just... unacceptable.

                                One answer. Mankind does not give a @!$%# about the planet and will destroy it all himself. Pretty sad because we are century's from getting mroe than a dozen people permanently off this planet.

                                  Reply#47 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:50 AM EST

                                  Ah, The three big D's: Deflection, Denial, Destruction. It is the human way!

                                  "For Beijing, cleaning up will take a whole generation but other regions don't even have any targets to cut coal burning. I bet the pollution here is mainly from those surrounding regions."

                                    Reply#48 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:52 AM EST

                                    We are just as much to blame. What is it we buy today that doesn't come from their slave labor force? Their air quality also affects us here. Go buy more Walmart!

                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#49 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:54 AM EST

                                    they say you can't sqeeze blood out of a turnip but you can make that turnip read reader comments an hour a day. maybe some of that reading will rub off on these turnips who call themselves lawmakers all over the world. these turnips are being pressured by lobyists to look the other way and proceed with business as usual. the ones who really need to be facing reality are the lawmakers of the world and they are apparently in la la land. technology is out there to clean the air. why isn't it being used? just manufacture a trillion dollar/yuan coin and pay for it with that.

                                      Reply#50 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:09 PM EST

                                      Good god that's awful.

                                        Reply#51 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:10 PM EST

                                        Put in some space-smokestacks and Chen's your uncle!

                                          Reply#52 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:16 PM EST
                                          Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.