Chinese government think tank urges end to unpopular one-child policy

Andy Wong / AP

Chinese families bring their babies to the Ritan Park in Beijing Wednesday, Oct. 31, 2012. A government think tank says China should start phasing out its one-child policy immediately and allow two children for every family by 2015. It remains unclear whether Chinese leaders are ready to take that step.

BEIJING -- A Chinese government think tank is urging the country's leaders to start phasing out its unpopular one-child policy immediately and allow two children for every family in the country by 2015.

Some demographers saw the timeline put forward by the China Development Research Foundation, which is close to the central leadership, as a bold move. Others warned that the gradual approach, if implemented, would be insufficient to help correct the problems that China's strict birth limits have created.

Xie Meng, a press officer with the foundation, said the final version of its report would be released "in a week or two," but Chinese state media were given advance copies.

The official Xinhua News Agency said the foundation was recommending a two-child policy in some provinces from this year and a nationwide two-child policy by 2015. It also proposed all birth limits be dropped by 2020.

"China has paid a huge political and social cost for the policy, as it has resulted in social conflict, high administrative costs and led indirectly to a long-term gender imbalance at birth," Xinhua said, citing the report.

The foundation's press officer told NBC News that the report was "the result of two years of effort." 

"China's demographic changes were analyzed in connection with seven areas," she said, citing the challenges of aging, unemployment, child and women's welfare, urbanization, education, health and family planning.

But it remains unclear whether Chinese leaders are ready to take up the recommendations. China's National Population and Family Planning Commission had no immediate comment on the report Wednesday.

'Change is inevitable'
While they are known to many as the one-child policy, the actual rules are more complicated. The government limits most urban couples to one child, and allows two children for rural families if their first-born is a girl. There are numerous other exceptions as well, including looser rules for minority families and a two-child limit for parents who are themselves both singletons.

Cai Yong, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, said the report carries extra weight because the think tank is under the State Council, China's Cabinet. He said he found it remarkable that state-backed demographers were willing to publicly propose such a detailed schedule and plan on how to get rid of China's birth limits.

Gruesome photos put spotlight on China's one-child policy

"That tells us at least that policy change is inevitable, it's coming," said Cai, who was not involved in the drafting of the report, but knows many of the experts who were. Cai is currently a visiting scholar at Fudan University in Shanghai. "It's coming, but we cannot predict when exactly it will come."

Adding to the uncertainty is a once-in-a-decade leadership transition that kicks off Nov. 8 that will see a new slate of top leaders installed by next spring.

Cai said the transition could keep population reform on the back burner or changes might be rushed through to help burnish the reputations of President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao on their way out.

There has been growing speculation among Chinese media, experts and ordinary people about whether the government will relax the one-child policy — introduced in 1980 as a temporary measure to curb surging population growth — and allow more people to have two children.

Though the government credits the policy with preventing hundreds of millions of births and helping lift countless families out of poverty, it is reviled by many ordinary people. The strict limits have led to forced abortions and sterilizations, even though such measures are illegal. Couples who flout the rules face hefty fines, seizure of their property and loss of their jobs.

Read more international stories on NBCNews.com

Many demographers argue that the policy has worsened the country's aging crisis by limiting the size of the young labor pool that must support the large baby boom generation as it retires. They also say it has contributed to the imbalanced sex ratio as some families abort baby girls, preferring to try for a male heir.

The government has recognized those problems and has tried to address them by boosting social services for the elderly. It has also banned sex-selective abortion and rewarded rural families whose only child is a girl.

Outdated or engine of growth?
Many today also see the birth limits as outdated, a relic of the era when housing, jobs and food were provided by the state.

"It has been 30 years since our planned economy was liberalized," commented Wang Yi, the owner of a shop that sells textiles online, under a news report about the foundation's proposal. "So why do we still have to plan our population?"

Ren Hao, a Chinese journalist who recently married, told NBC that he welcomed the proposed policy change but suggested that it be accompanied by new measures in education, health care and economy in order to succeed.

Read more China coverage on NBC's Behind The Wall

"Raising a child is quite a burden nowadays so, in the end, it's up to the couples to decide whether they want to have one child or more based on their conditions," he said.

Ji Jianming, a Beijing construction project manager, argued in favor of the policy. "The one-child policy was good," he said. "It allowed China to develop rapidly and improve people's lives faster."

Though open debate about the policy has flourished in state media and on the Internet, leaders have so far expressed a desire to maintain the status quo.

President Hu said last year that China would keep its strict family planning policy to keep the birth rate low and other officials have said that no changes are expected until at least 2015.

Wang Feng, director of the Brookings-Tsinghua Center for Public Policy and an expert on China's demographics, contributed research material to the foundation's report, but has yet to see the full text. He said he welcomed the gist of the document that he's seen in state media.

It says the government "should return the rights of reproduction to the people," he said. "That's very bold."

But Gu Baochang, a professor of demography at Beijing's Renmin University and a vocal advocate of reform, said the proposed timeline wasn't aggressive enough.

"They should have reformed this policy ages ago," he said. "It just keeps getting held up, delayed."

NBC News' Eric Baculinao and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

More world stories from NBC News:

Follow World News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

For all of you panicking about being overrun by zillions of Chinese people, you have nothing to fear. Once urbanization hits a key threshhold (that China is now at) and once the birth rate falls, for whatever reason, to below a certain point, you can't pay people to reproduce more even if you wanted them to.

If China discontinued the one child policy today, you'd see a spike in births over the first few years from the policy change, at the very most back up to just below the net 1 level (still lower than the US is today) and then the downward trend will resume as if nothing happened.

Taiwan - an ethnically and culturally Chinese country - in fact, MORE of a culturally Chinese country than China is anymore, has one of the developed world's lowest birth rates.

    Reply#29 - Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:02 PM EDT

    Did their population suddenly drop below a billion?

      Reply#30 - Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:08 PM EDT

      Right now 25% of US Real Estate has been purchased by Communist Chinese.
      What percent by Indians: we know they have the top 10 IT Firms in the USA: and employe their own.
      Each city has at least 10%
      So we take iin the worlds overpopulation while US Military are and have been disposed of on foreign soil each generation: self anhilation...
      What a nation of TRAITORS WITHIN...overfloweth
      2/3 US Pop increase alone is direct from Mexico usually a pregnant etc. from womb to tomb in receipt of Auto-welfare Citizenship from womb to tomb while we foot the bill for now 8-9 generationi in public housing...nothing paid for: just our lives and choices degradated...along with our nations environment, bird migratory paths, while cats and dogs are brutallyeuthanized: and ZOO ANIMALS are even sterilized..
      SELF DESTRUCT...unworthy except for a few...

        Reply#31 - Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:19 PM EDT

        umm.......... you prefer cats and dogs and zoo animals over mexicans?? nice.....

          #31.1 - Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:46 PM EDT
          Reply

          The Chinese wants more children?

          Bad news for America.

          Once the Chinese lift the one child ban on birthing in China there will be a whole lot of Chinese who need jobs.

          With the lower pay rate, no health insurance and the safety standards that American companies are made to provide to the American worker by the government so that America does not return to the 1800's when young kids as young as five worked in factors, more U.S. companies will move out of America to meet the demand of the growing population in China.

          More jobs will leave America thus affecting the U.S. economy that much more.

          ....and America wants to vote Romney in as president?

          Romney will be the first one to close downb jobs here in America and sell the assets to China while he banks hundreds of millions of dollars.

            Reply#32 - Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:52 PM EDT

            They can't fed and take of all the people they have now. They were the only nation that even tired to keep the population of this world under control, now this poor old earth will have no chance at all.

              Reply#33 - Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:35 PM EDT

              So does this mean that the second baby in each family will also be eligible to receive tainted baby formula too?

                Reply#34 - Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:53 PM EDT

                Too many Chinese is a horrible prospect for the rest of the world. There are already too many people on this bright blue planet. Don't forget--- One child per family is a GOOD thing for the rest of the world.

                  Reply#35 - Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:45 PM EDT

                  They need a "Have a child, eat a child" policy. You get one kid on the house but if you have another, you have to eat one; either the newborn or the 1st one. Problem solved. You're welcome, China

                    Reply#36 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 12:10 AM EDT

                    Whatever.

                    It's too late.

                    Stupid people have doomed the planet.

                    Only hope now... Find another one.

                      Reply#37 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 12:20 AM EDT

                      Just because you get rid of the 1 child policy doesn't mean all of the couples will start having multiple children. If you want to effectively curb population growth you give out free or inexpensive contriception, educate women on how to use these products and alow women in general to aquire upper levels of education. Population growth around the planet is slowing. Eventually years from now if this trend continues we will have few people in the world.

                        Reply#38 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:51 AM EDT

                        Not sure what planet you live, but population growth is EXPLODING, not slowing down.

                        Check a recent global population forecast, anywhere on the web.

                        This world is doomed, sooner than you think.

                          #38.1 - Wed Nov 7, 2012 4:22 PM EST
                          Reply

                          Send in the Mormon missionaries...

                            Reply#39 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:28 AM EDT

                            Wasserman-Schultz defends her party against suggestions that the Democrats are anti-Israel, saying "I would stack up the Democratic caucus's position on the support for Israel against the Republican caucus's any day of the week and be much more confident—and the Jewish community should be much more confident—in the Democrats' stewardship of Israel than the Republicans, especially if you compare the underlying reasons for both groups' support for Israel. The very far right group of Republicans' interest in Israel is not because they are so supportive of there being a Jewish state and making sure that Jews have a place that we can call home. It has references to Armageddon and biblical references that are more their interest. So I would encourage members of the Jewish community to put their faith in Democrats, because our support for Israel is generally for the right reasons."

                              Reply#40 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 7:55 AM EDT

                              Liberalization of birth policy will definitely increase Chinese population significantly before stabilizing. The full effect of a policy change takes 60 years to reach a steady state, because people live that long beyond their reproductive years. With a 2-child policy starting 2015, I'd estimate China will top out at 2.0B by 2075. That's another 0.6 billion mouths to feed, energy to consume, wastes to dispose of!

                              Chinese families have sacrificed to achieve close to ZPG....they would be better to convince the other nations to join their ZPG discipline, to preserve the Earth for future generations. All nations will suffer if China gives up its accomplishment.

                                Reply#41 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 1:20 PM EDT

                                Of course, the other policy change that will go along with this will relax policies allowing loyal Chinese citizens (in good standing of course) to immigrate to other countries...

                                  Reply#42 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 2:47 PM EDT
                                  Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.