An ax-wielding man burst into a day care center in China and attacked the children inside, killing three and wounding another 13 before police subdued him.
The incident took place Friday in China’s southern province of Guangxi.
Little else is known about the incident, which was first reported in China’s official state news agency, Xinhua. The children, aged between 6 and 12, were reportedly sitting down for lunch at a day care center in a local Pingan county residential compound when the man entered and began swinging at them with an ax.
Wounded children — some severely injured — were rushed to local area hospitals. Police who arrived at the scene were able to disarm the man and arrest him.
Police were still investigating the motivation behind the attack.
Violent incidents against children are not rare in mainland China. In the past two years, a string of attacks at schools and day care centers involving lone attackers rattled the country, culminating with a series of three consecutive school attacks that took place over a three-day period in 2010.
In one of the incidents, Xu Yuyuan, 47, entered a Jiangsu province school in April 2010 and stabbed 29 children and three teachers. Xu told a court the next month that he wanted to "vent his rage against society," and that he was angry after a series of public humiliations and unsuccessful business ventures.
Determined to show that authorities were getting tough on crime against children, the court sentenced Xu to death after a half-day trial.
At the time, officials and social commentators argued that the incidents were isolated and committed by mentally unstable persons or those with extreme grievances against the government.
Many around the country, however, argued the attacks underscored both increasing societal pressures on Chinese people and an urgent need for China to overhaul how it approaches mental health evaluation and treatment.
Earlier this year, Chinese legislatures had begun discussion on much needed mental health law reforms.
More world stories from NBC News:
- Pakistan cops open fire on film protesters on 'Day of Love'
- US soldier who refused to go back to Iraq arrested on return from Canada
- Australian deputy PM: 'Cranks and crazies' in GOP threaten US economy
- Iran seen behind cyber attacks on US banks
- White House: Libya consulate siege that killed four was 'terrorist attack'
- Myanmar's Aung San Suu Kyi calls for release of Russian punk band Pussy Riot
- Stay informed: Sign up for our newsletter


Lock the parents in a room with the guy and call it a day. Poor kids :(
And they get axes and he doesn't?
Ban axes, axes kill people. While we are at it, ban cars. Cars kill 110 people a day on average in the United States.
The police SUBDUED him????? He killed innocent children, wounded handfuls of others, and wasn't shot on sight?! Violence against women and children should never be tolerated, for one second! Hope he is exterminated like his predecessor for such violence.
he'll be shot & his family charged for the cost of the bullet.
In order to drive a car in the US, I have to:
a. Take a driving course for several months.
b. Be licensed by the government to drive.
c. Pay licensing fees for my vehicle.
d. have an identifying tag on my car at all times that allows law enforcement to easily track its use.
Are you willing to accept these same common sense restrictions on guns as you are on cars? If not, why not? You brought up the car analogy.
Hey pedro you couldnt kill me with an Axe if you tryed. Id take it from you and jam it up your azz.. or if you are too big for me to handle... id run and you would not catch me. This guy used it on children not on grown men. Be realistic. You cant disarm people with assault weapons and you cant run from them. As far as cars goes.. Not many crazy people fantasize about car violence.. but they do about gun violence. False Equivalency. Different solutions are needed for different problems. Understand the difference fool? And you brought this up. I did not.
All that training, licenses, tags, and taxes...and Americans still can't drive from A to B without seriously injuring or killing someone. F'ing retardation nation! BTW, I support more reasonable axe laws in China. And here in America, a card that states that you can chew gum and walk at the same time before you are issued a drivers license.
Rest in Peace little ones...
Any person involved in a childs death, upon dna conviction, should receive death immediately. Hurt a child, lose you life..
Byron, lets add we have to keep insurance on our cars in case we do something insane like kill someone with it....lets make gun owners carry insurance also....Like your ideas and think its ridiculous when people compare cars to guns...this was an axe yes anything can kill someone but lets deal with solving gun/ax control problem on another day...this was awful, those poor children...I hope they have tighter security for their daycares if their mentally ill see that is the place to vent their rage against....what a world.
China ...hmmmm....
Was he hungry maybe ?
WTF is in the water over there? "I am pissed off at the government so I will take it out on children"? Be a man and take the axe to the police station and let them put some vent holes in your head
As a species we humans are certainly a screwed up group...............and we are supposed to be the top of the chain on this planet.............Earth is screwed.
Byron/Lisa:
It is a fact that Cars kill way more people than guns. Wheter on purpose or accident it does not matter. Does car insurance bring back dead people? NO so stupid analgy.
As far as the license thing that they can track you.... Guns have federal mandates and a lot of paperwork to fill out, who you are, SS number, address, and they check it out thouroughly.
To get a car- lets see take a test, drive for 15 minutes- hey now you can drive.
If guns killed as many people as cars do you liberals would be screaming for the government to do something... oh wait you guys already do it.
NO self reliance to take care and wipe your own ass Huh?
I heard he did it to protest a movie made in Egypt about how Chinese can't drive.
Good thing they outlawed guns. SEE it worked!! Gun violence is WAY down!! What was that? Ax? Hatchet? Sword? Don't worry about those. Just a good thing they got those dangerous guns out of the hands of those that want to protect themselves - and now you have no way to protect yourself from those who STILL plan to injure you. WATCH OUT FOR THE AX!!
ProBus is obtuse.
"Hey pedro you couldnt kill me with an Axe if you tryed."
Ian, you have an unrealistic perception of the danger a person armed with an ax (or sword or mace) poses. Battle-ax is nothing more than a regular ax and it was enough for Germanic tribsmen to cut down 2 Roman legions - armed, armored and trained.
You may be able to outrun a guy with an axe in an open terrain, however in a direct confrontation you will be dead in seconds unless you have a shield or a solid melee training and a weapon.
...and violence against men SHOULD be tolerated? It's 2012...our lives count, as well. ALL violence against any innocent person shouldn't be tolerated. Now go back to watching Lifetime.
Axe-control. Axes kill people.
rbjk- If there was a 250 pound beast of a man locked in a gym with 200 innocent people, (men, women, and children), and he had an axe, or a bat, who would you rather he aim for, the women half his weight, and the babies? Of course violence should not be tolerated, towards any one. But I would have to say that a fight between a man and another man is a TAD BIT more balanced than taking out a woman half his weight, or for God sakes..children and babies. Grow a pair, and quit whining about it. Don't turn my statement into a man-bashing statement. Women and children are supposed to be off limits in times of war, they were supposed to be first off the sinking Titanic, it's just the way it is.
Quit interrupting my Lifetime movie! Ha
Pedro Sanchez - Why do people continually come up with the above, asinine remark in response to stories such as this one?
Automobiles are a necessity in our society, at least for the majority of the adult population. Their primary purpose is transportation, and to drive, one is required to pass a competency test that includes both written knowledge and actual use.
The basic purpose of guns is as a projectile weapon, to be used against either other people or animals.
Yes, some people use guns for target shooting, or regard them as collectors items, and some people race cars, or collect them. But guns were not invented with the intent of shooting at clay pigeons any more than cars were invented so that people would have something to drive around in circles for 500 miles every year in Indianapolis.
Also, please somebody take note that China, a nation of 1.5 billion people, roughly 5 times the population of the U.S., has one incident of this sort every year or two. The United States has another spree killing almost every week.
Was the axe registered? Did he have a license to have an axe? Was there a 5 day waiting period before he could buy an axe? Did he attend an axe safety class? So many unanswered questions.
HOW did he get into the daycare with an axe and no one notice or stop him? Sawed off handle and under a trenchcoat? That country is ready to implode anyhow. Overpopulated, families crammed together, no place to hide, a govt who just doesn't give a freak. All they care about is taking over the US, at a colossal cost to their own kind. No wonder they're going mad.
Those doors should have been locked down tight with one door open to the public for entrance, and an on duty guard. They should have already learned from the past.
My Lord, more little innocents lost to violence. Some people have just become so used to bad behavior & become numb to the violence.
Back in my day, any of us, or the kid down the block acted up, trust me, the whole neighborhood knew. And so did the parents, and it WAS dealt with. And usually, not always, it ceased. You always have one or two, but not hundreds, or thousands like gangs. Parents not parenting is destroying the whole planet.
Probusiness - Did you note that this man attacked children in a day care center, not adults, or was that too much reading for you?
Nobody claims that removing all guns will prevent all murders in the U.S., not any more than traffic laws prevent all fatal accidents. But just as speed limits and requiring drivers to stay to the right greatly lessens the number of fatalities, so too, outlawing hand guns would greatly reduce the murder rate.
Logic: they don't teach in school anymore, do they?
dman,
I agree with all you said, except the outlawing of guns.
I am a single female living alone. Although I live in a very nice neighborhood ( like that matters anymore ), I have a 9MM that I promise you will protect me. It WILL make me equal to any man or woman who thinks it's okay to enter my home without an invitation.
I don't know what they're here for??? Should I ask them when they kick in my back door.....ahem, ahem, are you just here for the electronics? Ooohhh, okay then, by all means, take them, I didn't want them anyhow. Hell, I don't even know why I bought them? Oh, yeah, I forgot, I thought you might drop by and decide YOU wanted them, that was it for sure.
Sorry, I have no drugs, as I don't use them. However, if you're having a headache, I have a couple Aleve....would you like a couple of those?
What do you mean you want sex? HUH? Oh, and no witnesses either? Damn.
And no I'm sorry, I'm not that into S & M....sorry. Could you just pleeeaaaaseeee take my stuff and leave. Don't worry, I'll clean up the mess you just made. Okay, maybe later on this week, we'll "friend" each other on facebook. Okay, have a good night...bye bye.
I think not...the police will be snapping pics, and yes, I'll still be cleaning up. Only thing, it will be their blood and not mine.
I'm not a fanatic, however I absolutely believe in protecting myself. Or maybe YOU would like protect me since you clearly think my "equalizer" should be outlawed!
Sorry, that is just not common sense my friend.
I don't have to watch Lifetime to know the world would be much safer, more humane, and all around more mature without men in it. And yes, that WAS intended as man-bashing.
FamousAmos,
So women should live over men is what you are saying. Innocent men are fair game in war, and we should drown before women. Yeah, good thing we dont live in the 1950's anymore. There is no more women first when it comes to emergencies. Please evolve with the rest of us.
In the pro--free borders with Mexico city of Los Angeles, Mayor Pancho Villa(ragoisa) has directed law enforcement to not seize or detain any illegal alien fround without a driver's license, insurance or auto registration. LA Mayor Pancho Villa(ragoisa) has proposed that all illegal aliens be provided with Los Angeles City Library Cards and that those will be a substitute for driver's licenses, voter identification, social security numbers, etc.
Whos There - I can certainly see your viewpoint, and if I felt the need, I might keep some type of fire arm in my house too. I do not.
But my rebuttal question for you is why do you require a 9mm hand gun for defense of your home and person? Would not a pump action shotgun serve equally well?
A hand gun can be carried in a concealed fashion, and easily transported to wherever a criminal is looking to commit a crime, including your home. A shotgun cannot, not without illegal modifications.
Hand guns strike me as a large part of the problem. They are not necessary for defense of the home, and if you are confronted on the street by an armed assailant, it is unlikely you'll be able to draw and shoot before he uses his weapon, not unless you name is "Dirty Harry" Callahan.
Easy Pedro, no one wants to take your gun away from you.
dman:
I have extensive knowledge about firearms. My need for a 9MM is for two things:
Protection: 9MM's are powerful enough, and yet pretty acurate. It's not like it's an oozie. Home protection, it does work well, I assure you.
Ease of Use: Handy & available unlike a rifle. I am of a shorter kind of gal, and I know my weapon of choice for my protection. Again, does it really matter what I choose to protect myself? It isn't like I'm riding around town looking for the miscreants of the world to shoot. Just isn't the case.
I could also get a BB gun. Don't bring a knife to a gun fight, Clint. Love him, love him. Those were the days when men were men and women were women. And I don't mean shooting & OK CORRAL fights. I mean when men/women only shot when necessary. Now...don't you wish that was true today as well?
dman:
I'm still trying to think about your thought on this. You would have to be a woman, living alone & see what is going on & still think that it's okay NOT to arm yourself. I think that is irresponsible these days. It happens all too often that people are robbed ( the least of their worries ), raped, killed. Not to mention their families.
I learned back in the 70's about gun safety, gun respect from my father in law. Lord protect & keep this wonderful man. I learned at a young age about the safety & respect of the weapon.
The thugs & gangbangers today only know how to discharge the weapon. Aiming? No.... Just aimlessly shooting all over the place, taking out innocents. Think out of the circle of hate & drug addled idiots. IF THEY KNOW everyone is armed...at least the ones who give a hoot, they will NOT INVADE your home. Of course , half of those idiots think they will live forever, I get that.
Still, I will NEVER give up my right to defend / protect my family, self or home. Afterall, this is still America.... isn't it?
dman:
I pray for you & yours that nothing ever happens. I also pray for everyone on the planet the same thing, really I do pray for this.
However, I look to reality. Sometimes there are those with unkind, or evil thoughts, those are the only ones I worry about when I speak of a weapon. They need not come into my families life, my life or my home. Let the Lord or Satan worry about them in the afterlife. They will only have to worry about me in this life if they think they will disrupt my family or my life.
Most of the people in the world still think in our way: work hard, live a good life, have a good life, enjoy & be happy.
@ dman-353357,
I love your logical fallacy propaganda.
First of all, does it matter where he attacked? Point is he attacked innocent people...
Comparing gun laws to traffic laws is ridiculous. People ONLY follow speed limits when there is a cop around or suspicion of one. That's the same as people not robbing a store because they fear the clerk is going to be armed and willing to defend them self. Requiring drivers to stay on the right side of the road is the same scenario. Why don't we drive on the left? The fear of an oncoming vehicle. If there is an oncoming car, odds are there is going to be a fatal accident. That's the same as a home intruder not robbing a house because they fear to meet an armed home-owner.
So no, they obviously didn't teach logic in your school.
2nd post. @ dman-35337, been watching too many westerns? The idea of concealed carry is not to let your opponent know you're armed. you don't just draw while he's aiming a gun at you; you have to know when is appropriate to draw and when not to. Of course this might be too much common sense to comprehend.
Finally, I don't understand... if you feel safe and don't feel the need to own a gun, what's the problem with people owning guns now? If you don't think you're in danger, what's the problem? Just feel the need to control other people?
Because as everyone knows, gun laws eliminates violence.
The point is he was able to wreck so much havoc with axe, because he was attacking children. A man with an axe may be a formidable opponent, but he can only attack a single person at a time, giving other adults a chance to evade harm.
Nobody can outrun a bullet, or didn't you get that far in school.
Hardly, the continual, ridiculous argument is that murders still occur in countries with more stringent (and more stringently enforced) gun laws, so, of course, gun laws must be useless and should be repealed.
What pundits such as yourself cannot seem to grasp, is that murder occurs less frequently, actually far less frequently, in countries where gun laws are strict, and are strictly enforced.
The same could be said about traffic laws. Even though they do not prevent all traffic deaths, they do greatly reduce them. People do occasionally run a red light, or ignore a stop sign, and more than occasionally, exceed the posted speed limit, or drive in the break down lane. Very rarely, one hears of somebody driving down the wrong side of the road.
Sometimes these infractions do cause fatal accidents.
This does not mean that the traffic laws are ineffective. Nor does the fact that murders still occur in Canada or Western Europe, or China mean that their gun laws are not effective.
A law does not have to be 100% effective to be effective in its goal. If it did, more than half the laws on the books could be adjudged as useless.
Got it?
All laws are obeyed due fear of the consequences. You seem to think that potential robbers are primarily dissuaded by fear of an armed store clerk. Yet these robberies still occur, even though the proprietors of many small stores do have firearms handy.
Why is that?
Why did the shooter who took out four armed [and armored] police officers in Lakewood, Washington, in 2009, not change his mind when he saw his victims were armed?
The answer is the same in both cases. Because the perpetrator has the element of surprise working for him [or her]. They choose the moment, not the victim, and I don't think many people can outdraw a person who already has a gun pointed at them, or out-maneuver a speeding bullet.
Because, the very prevalence of guns in this country, legal and illegal, increases the chances that a criminal I encounter will be armed.
Of all the guns used to commit murders, rapes and robberies, what percentage were originally manufactured and sold legally?
95%?
99%?
Yet eventually, these guns found their way into criminal hands. They are as common as gumdrops in America, which is at least part of the reason why we have more murders per capita than any country in Western Europe or Canada, or hadn't you noticed?
"logical fallacy propaganda"... Cute phrase. I wonder what it means.
Do I need the governments permission to buy a car? No.
Do I need to buy the car from only certain people with licenses to sell cars? No.
Can I buy as many cars as I want each week/month/year. Yes
Can I buy small cars, big cars, slow cars, fast cars, cars that look dangerous? Yes
Can I buy Hummers virtually like the troops use? Yes.
Do I have to wait from 5 to 15 days to pick up my car. No
If I traded in one car for a newer model do I still have to wait five to ten days to pick the new one up. No
Can I modify my car to allow more fuel, more performance, or better cornering. Yes
Would I have to turn over to the government without compensation some models of automobiles that might be banned years after I buy them. No
Do I need a license to buy a car? No
(in most states)
Can I buy a car at age 16? Yes.
Are driving lessons mandated in most high schools? Yes
Can I buy a car from anyone in any state? Yes.
Can I sell my car to anyone in any state? Yes
Can convicted felons buy, own or drive a car. Yes
In some places (e.g. NYC or New Jersey) would I first need a permit to buy from the police department which sometimes takes up to 2 years to obtain. No
In some cities (e.g. Washington D.C.) would I have to store your car partially disassembled. No
Do I need to register a car that I own? No (as long as I keep it on my own property)
Do I need a background check or waiting period to buy a car? No
Is my car held responsible if I misuse it? No
Would failure to register my car be a federal felony (prevents me from owning another one). No
Do I need to "safe store" my car even though many are stolen and used for criminal purposes? No
Will I lose my driver's license if I violate the law with my car? Most likely not
Can I legally drive my car into any state/city in the nation with every jurisdiction honoring my registration/license? Yes
Shall I go on? Or do you really, really want to treat guns like cars?
Funny thing, we see in England, a strict gun ban country, that began keeping crime data in 1898, they had a murder rate of 1.0 per 100k people and no gun control.
In 2010 they have a murder rate of 1.3 per 100k people and strict gun control.
Such a recurring trend, no data to prove gun control reduces violence, a trend seen in every gun ban country.
Maybe you can show everyone how Haynes vs US 390, 85 1968 doesnt rule that felons are not legally held to obey any law requiring them to violate their 5th amendment right of no self incrimination.
Geez, that makes what, oh right, about 85% of the existing 20,000 gun control laws not applicable to felons anyway.
We see in June 2010, the 80 year old Army veteran in Chicago IL, suprised by a burglar who shot first. The old man retrieved his own firearm and killed the bad guy. Next week, same town, store owner is suprised by a bad guy who also shoots first, the store owner retrieves his firearm, and kills the bad guy.
Such a recurring trend, the bad guys are not perfect, resistance is not futile, unless you believe the Star Trek fictional character the BORG truly exist, and even they lose in the end, such a normal morallity ploy, the bad guy losing.
Speaking of where resistance wasnt futile,
Lets review the following 14 mass shootings, and note what the body counts were where resistance occurred versus no resistance.
October 16, 1991, Luby’s Cafeteria, Killeen, TX, “Gun-Free”: 1 gunman, 23 murdered, 20 injured.
April 20, 1999, Columbine, “Gun-Free”: 2 gunmen, 13 murdered, 24 injured. Many were murdered AFTER the police were “on scene”.
April 16, 2007, Virginia Tech, “Gun-Free”: 1 gunman, 32 murdered, 25 injured. Most were murdered AFTER the police were “on scene”.
Feb 14,2008 Northern Illinois University, 1 gunman, 5 dead, 18 injured, gunman kills self long before police arrive to engage.
Nov 5 ,2009 Ft Hood Texas, 1 gunman, 13 dead, 30 wounded. Military personnel on base are BANNED from having a weapon, but the shooter did, and it was almost 9 minutes before police responded
July 2012 Aurora CO, 1 gunman, 13 dead, 70 wounded
Aug 2012 Oak Creek WI, 1 gunman, 6 dead, 4 wounded
Gun Free Zone 7 incidents
Defenseless victims murdered: 105
Defenseless victims injured: 191
December 17, 1991 Shoney’s Family Restaurant, Anniston, AL: 3 gunmen, 20 hostages, one ARMED customer (Thomas Glenn Terry). Police finally arrived to find one dead robber, one wounded robber and the third had fled when the shooting started. NO INJURED INNOCENTS.
October 1, 1997, Pearl High School: 1 gunman, 2 murdered, 7 injured: Stopped by ARMED vice principal.
January 16, 2002, Virginia Appalachian School of Law: 1 gunman, 3 murdered, 3 injured. Killer was stopped when confronted by two ARMED students.
Nov 20, 2005 Tacoma WA, 20 yr old juvenile delinquent shoots 4 (1 non gun shot wounded) then exchanges shots with an armed civilian wounding him, but then takes 4 hostages and holes up before surrendering to police.
Feb 12, 2007 Trolley Mall Salt Lake Utah 1 gunman, 4 killed, 5 wounded before on scene off duty policeman shot and killed the heavily armed killer. Hundreds of people still in mall when shooting ended before on duty police arrived.
Dec 9 2007, Colorado Springs, New Life Church, 1 gunman 2 murdered, 3 injured, gunman stopped when armed woman shoots gunman, who then turns gun on self and commits suicide, while 100 other church members are in church.
May 4th, College Station Georgia 2 gunman, 10 victims, 1 dead gunman, 1 victim wounded. The 2 thugs robbing a party begin discussing if they have enough bullets to do the job. One man retrieves his firearm, kills one thug, chases the other off.
Where murderers encountered ARMED resistance 7 incidents
murdered: 11
Where murderers encountered ARMED resistance; injured: 24
296/35 = 8.45
Wow, where no resistance occurred 8.45 plus times higher body count.
Yep, a higher body count is morally superior to a lower body count based on your irrelevant beliefs.
Hey lets review the defensive gun uses since oh, the middle of June 2012, from just one web site that collates those police and media reports, Keep & Bear Arms, not to mention other websites such as KC3, Armed Citizen, American Rifleman, Guns Save Lives..
• Store owner shoots at robbers (KY)
• Gunman dies from gunshot wounds (UT)
• St. Paul mom, daughter hold burglar for police with pink gun (MN)
• 10 year-old with BB gun saves mother's life from attacker (WA)
• Buckeyes for Concealed Carry President Uses Handgun to Defend Family (OH)
• Homeowner Wakes Up To Morning Home Invader, Fights Back (SC)
• Employee fatally shoots back at customer who opened fire at Don's Guns (IN)
• DGU of the Day: Shotgun-Wielding Neighbor Runs Off Rapist Edition (TX)
• Big Bad Wolf gets perforated while threatening Little Red Riding Hood (TX)
• Musician in CA Uses Gun to Stop Burglars For The Second Time In His Life (CA)
• Police: Detroit man shot back at would-be robbers, killed teen (MI)
• Disabled Homeowner Shoots and Kills Female Burglar (OK)
• Big Bad Wolf gets perforated while threatening Little Red Riding Hood (TX)
• Disabled Oklahoma Homeowner Shoots and Kills 1 of 3 Women Who Broke Into His Home (OK)
• 68-year-old woman fires gun to chase off attacker (OH)
• Armed Houston, TX Restaurant Owner Chases Off 2 Burglars (TX)
• Winslow Township Pharmacist Fires Handgun At Would-Be Robber (NJ)
• Homeowner Catches Three Car Thieves, Held Them at Gunpoint Until Police Arrived (MO)
• NOLA Homeowner Still Without Power Shoots Looter in the Face (LA)
• Phoenix Homeowner Unloads Birdshot into Would-be Robber (AZ)
• Homeowner Shoots 1 of 2 Intruders, Suspects Caught When They Ran Right Into a Rape Crime Scene (IN)
• Lexington, KY Homeowner Shoots At, Scares Off Daytime Intruder (KY)
• Father and Son Exchange Gunfire With Burglars; Both Homeowners and 1 Suspect Were Shot (GA)
• Detroit Party Store Owner Shoots Three of Four Burglars, Killing One (MI)
• Mother Defends Her Toddler by Shooting at Daytime Home Invader (SC)
• Palm Beach, FL Shoots and Kills 1 of 2 Home Invasion Suspects (FL)
• Female Homeowner in Columbia, TN Shoots Career Criminal Who Was Attacking House Guest (TN)
• Off Duty Reserve Police Officer in TX Shoots Intruder in the Head, Killing Him (TX)
• 92-year-old Verona man shoots intruder at home (KY)
• Amazing Video: Fast Draw Security Guard at Internet Cafe Shoots 1 of 3 Armed Robbers in FL (FL)
• Neighbors: Early morning shooting an act of self-defense (CA)
• 92-year-old Ohio homeowner guns down intruder (OH)
• 76 Year Old Real Estate Employee in WA Shoots Early Morning Office Burglar (WA)
• Defensive Gun Use of the Day: You Go Girl Edition (MI)
• Indianapolis Homeowner Confronts and Shoots Late Night Home Invader; Protects His Wife/Daughter (IN)
• Portland, OR Homeowner Scares Off Burglar With Shotgun Blast While His Wife and Child Slept (OR)
• DGUotD II: Concealed Carry Texan Stops Stabbing at San Antonio School (TX)
• Montana rancher shoots black bear that broke into home (MT)
• Texas Smoke Shop Owner Shoots At, Fights Off, Two Armed Robbers While His Wife Watches (TX)
• Armed mother saves 2 year-old from kidnapper (CA)
• Savannah, GA Homeowner Shoots and Kills Suspected Home Invader (GA)
• Armed customer shoots dollar store robber, killing him (FL)
• Vancouver, WA Homeowner Shoots and Kills Intruder Who Forced His Way Into Bedroom (WA)
• Police: Security guard fired in self-defense (LA)
• Armed Citizen Stops Violent Attack on Cop (LA)
• Homeowner Shoots 1 of 2 Intruders Using His .357 Magnum (IL)
• Homeowner Fires Shots at Multiple Intruders (MS)
• Don't Bring A Knife To A Gun Fight (NC)
• Homeowner Shoots Late Night Home Invader Who Threatened His Wife (TX)
• Man Who Tried to Force His Way Into Home is Shot, Killed by 66 Year Old Veteran With .357 Magnum (OR)
• 87 Year Old NC Woman Uses 9mm Handgun to Scare Off 2 Home Invaders (NC)
• Las Vegas Dairy Queen Clerk Shoots, Kills Sword Wielding Masked Robber (NV)
• Armed Homeowner Scares Teens Trying To Steal Entire Safe (CO)
• Suspected Burglar Shot In Neck; Drives Self To Hospital (CA)
• Defensive Guns Use of the Day: No One Needs More Than Ten Rounds, Vol II Edition (KS)
• Caretaker at Dayton apostolic temple shoots burglar (OH)
• Alabama woman shoots home invader to protect ax and knife wielding daughters (AL)
• Houston, TX Homeowner Shoots 1 of 3 Men Burglarizing His Neighbor’s Home (TX)
• Macon store employee shoots car burglar in Academy Sports parking lot (GA)
• Homeowner Shoots Would Be Home Invader (KY)
• Elderly FL Homeowner Shoots and Kills Knife Wielding Home Invader (FL)
• Shotgun Wielding Street Robber Shot by Concealed Carrying Victim (TX)
• Bystanders help stabbing victim (TX)
• Armed Robber Foiled by Gun-Owning Store Clerk (VA)
• Minnesota Man Fights for His Life in Brutal Deer Attack, Shoots Crazed Buck
• Grocery Store Clerk Shoots At, Scares Off Armed Robber (VA)
• Store Clerk Fires 3 Shots At Armed Robber – Firefight Caught on Security Camera (FL)
• Gun Shop Owner Shoots All 3 Men Who Drove a Car Into His Shop to Rob It (SC)
• Homeowner Shoots 1 of 2 Home Invaders in Buttocks (NV)
• Homeowner Shoots and Kills 1 of 2 Home Invaders as 12 Year Old Family Member Sleeps (FL)
• Concealed Carrier Shoots and Kills Man Waving Gun Around Inside Home (FL)
• Intruder shot dead at Oakland grow house (CA)
• Texas Man Shoots Home Invader in Self-Defense! (TX)
• 65 Year Old CA Woman Shoots and Fights Off FIVE Armed Robbers (CA)
• 66 Year Old Kansas City, MO Shop Owner Shoots 1 of 2 Burglars He Caught Looting His Shop (MO)
Oh, do remember that the govt. and police recognize that in only of 15% of violent crimes a firearm is used, is a shot fired. DOJ Firearms use by Offenders Nov 2001
Do remember the govt acknowledges in multiple police firearm discharge reports that on avg. only 15% of those shots fired was the target hit.
2008 CDC 12,252 murders, 70,000 injuries, FBI UCR 1.38 Mil violent crimes reported, 381,000 involved a firearm.
Lets see 381,000 x 15% = 57,150 times shots fired in violent crimes
57,150 x 15% = 8,573 total injuries , uh but there were over 82,252 total injuries in 2008, oh thats right, you have to work off the actual injuries to see how many incidents occur.
Unless of course you have better data to refute the governments data, naw, you antis never do.
Dont forget that the USDOJ National Victimization 2008, reports that 70% of all violent crimes never getreported.
Hey, lets review a CDC report from 1994, they are anti gun.
"Estimating intruder related firearm retrievals in U.S. households, 1994."
The CDC estimated that "497,646 incidents occurred in which the intruder was seen and reportedly scared away by the firearm... " And that is an annual number.
Almost 500k defensive uses of a gun in one year, only in homes. Many defenses uses of guns are never reported because the defender simply shows the gun and the criminal ceases.
http: // www . ncbi . nlm . gov / pubmed / 9591354
Were you aware of this study? It's not done by a pro-gun think-tank , it's the CDC.
You were saying?
Well done RLee!!
All actions are determined by the possible outcomes. It's the same thing, people still make bad decisions, the possible outcome doesn't stop everyone, nor do laws. Unless you can back it up, I sincerely doubt the truth behind: "the proprietors of many small stores do have firearms handy."
Because he was planning on it. That was his goal... He knew he was going to be attacking an armed target. You think any gun laws would stop him from carrying out this deed? This scenario is also different than you average home invasion, armed robbery case. Where they don't know what to expect. They're not counting on the 'victim' being armed.
Which is my point you entirely missed...The idea is NOT to get into a "draw" with the attacker while staring each other down... and unless the perpetrator drugged them self previously, odds are they're not going to be as calm as you suspect. They wont have have a perfect shot; they will probably be nervous and shaky. Unless you're at point-blank range, you may have an opportunity to go for cover with a diversion. Not saying this will always be the case...
But you feel safe, you must not encounter criminals... If you do, why not consider owning a gun? ...It sounds like you would be pretty helpless if they came at you with even a knife..... or an ax, never mind a gun.
Ever heard of the Black Market? How about Operation Fast and Furious? Illegal Arms Tade sound familiar? Those guns are already out there, will never be able to confiscate them all...
Which is funny, because it reminds me of the 'War on Drugs' which we are without a doubt winning. ...and by winning I mean dumping billions of dollars annually into with no positive progress. Obtaining drugs now is probably easier than if they were to be legalized.
Always happy to educate, would hate to keep you wondering...
Visit Propaganda critic . com, it will not allow me to post a link here...
Excellent post RLee Emerysgt
@ WHOS THERE Good for you. Keep your 9mm. It's perfect for you. Little kick so it resets for a second shot easily. @ dman back off. If WHOS THERE was carrying a shotgun or any long gun it would be so easy to disarm her if she was securing her home. As soon as that long barrell poked around the corner it would be snatched. Any experienced gun person knows that. Granted it's easy to see that handguns can be concealed. Nice deduction of the obvious but that is not her intent. To all the tastelesss jokes and ban axes and cars as analogies to guns. Grow up. Today was a sad day for the worlds children. Two elementary schools and a day care center attacked by guns, a knife , and an axe. Pray for them and their families. That's what matters. You people make me sick. (Not All)
I'm proud of you for being responsible for your own safety WHOS THERE. However having guns for protection isn't for most people.
China needs to implement tougher ax laws. Ax free school zones , mandatory ax registration. Get the UN committee on reducing the proliferation of axes worldwide.
And quit making movies about ax wielding gangs, like the Kung-fu Hustle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kung_Fu_Hustle
Lets look at it this way .. if the guy had automatic guns instead of an ax, the heading would have read "13 killed and 3 wounded" instead of the other way round.
"obogottago" ... don't quit your day job yet. You have a long way to go being a funny man.
Automatic guns? Even in America, you're not allowed to own an "Automatic Gun". Since guns are illegal in China, the comment you criticized seems rather rational.
Logical,you have a long way to go to make sense! The comment about "ax control" is a funny comment,go stick your head back in the sand or oven,Moron!
Logical,
If one of the victims had a gun, the ax wielder might be dead and the other 16 might be unhurt.
Does that mean I can get in trouble if I axe you a question?
I think what you mean to say, is that every citizen in China should have an Ax to defend themselves. If those 6 year old kids were all wielding Axes, surely the world would be a safer place.
Cunical - where did you get your information? You can indeed own an automatic weapon in the US. They sell them at gun stores. Stop buy a gun store sometime and see the mass murder weapons that are available ... legally.
And YES FOLKS, COMMON SENSE has left the planet!
Beam me up, Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here.
I'm sorry Samantha-1783461, Automatic weapons are a little harder to acquire than you make believe. Most firearms stores do not stock automatic weapons, semi-automatic... yes; which are FAR different. In order to even purchase one of these "automatic weapons" you need a Class III/FFL and deep pockets to legally buy one. Unless it's your life goal to spend $15,000 + to go slaughter a few people, I doubt anyone buying a legal automatic weapon is going to use it with the intent to "go slaughter a lot of people." However, those with the intent to do just that generally know very little about what they're getting themselves into. In which case they usually buy an intimidating looking "assault-rifle" (semi-automatic rifle). what happens? The gun fails or jams on them because they're clueless of proper maintenance, care and operation of that particular rifle.
For all those people calling for tighter gun control, this incident should point out that the threat to children is not restricted to guns.
It is the deranged mind of an individual. With no guns available to him, he has taken a common tool and murdered three children.
More effort needs to be spent on mental health issues and solutions than simply "banning guns".
go clean your chamber and make sure it's not loaded first, or don't make sure
Axes have another purpose besides killing. Guns don't. That's the difference. Get it?
That's right. It's really hard to behead someone with a gun. Besides, don't you know it's unsporting to hunt with anything other than an ax? Did you know the Comanches looked down on the Souix for using bows and arrows against buffalo? Now the vikings, they were real men! No sissy weapons for them.
Sam Adams.... guns are used also for self protection !! GET IT ????
I use my guns to make little holes in pieces of paper with circles drawn on them. Guns are used for sport and competition far more than they're used for killing.
get it?
My husband owns a few guns which are all for hunting. He only hunts what we will eat.
I am so sick of hearing about the problem with guns. Guns are not the problem. Criminals are the problem and they will continue to commit crimes even if guns become illegal because they will still have guns.
I find in interesting that the people who want more gun laws are typically the same ones that are bleeding hearts for criminals and don't expect any personal responsibility or accountability.
Sam Adams sez,
I say, break in my house armed with an axe and see what happens. You will lose. Get it? And nothing is better on the table than game that we harvested.
I cannot imagine the grief the families are going through right now. It must be unbearable for them. My heart truly goes out to them.
Gee, I don't remember a year when axes in the hands of goons killed over 11,000 people in a year in the US. Yeah, you're right...no diffidence.
Um, no...YOU'LL lose. If the guy's bigger than you and you're fast asleep. You computer-Rambos are a laugh.
Nope, not a computer rambo, just a person who isn't going to be a victim. I have dogs that would alert me before I would wake to a surprise visitor. Oh yeah, and a big husband who was in the military for 20 years. We're not exactly stupid people. Quite the opposite in fact.
You wannabe victims are the laugh.
If someone breaks down my door they're going to make lots of noise doing it. My bedroom is at the back of the house, 50 yards from any of the doors. I will wake up, get my tricked out semi-auto AKM copy and solve the problem of an axe wielding intruder with a quick double tap to the high chest. Unless he's wearing military-grade armor, he WILL go down!
Oh Sam, Sam, Sam Adams. Drinking too many "Samuel Adams"?
If that is what you truly think, then please just look at it this way. Maybe that's all guns are for in your mind. In my mind I have to say, probably yes, nooo, absolutely yes.
IF & WHEN someone breaks into my home, then yes, absolutely yes, it will be used to kill. Now, I've said it. Still offend you? Taking my gun may only lead to my demise. Would you rather I die, sleeping in my own bed having sweet dreams because the only ones with guns are thugs who decided they like my large screen tv?
You clearly could not have been a "forefather" of the USA. Perhaps you are from another country? It just doesn't always work perfectly, it just doesn't, welcome to life. However most people who own guns are not the problem, it's the no-brainer idiots these days who just want everything for nothing. That is not me, so do NOT act is if YOU have the right to deny ME my weapon. Sometimes that's all we have to even believe we have a chance to defend ourselves.
HK... Did you mean 50 FEET? Or your house just massive?
So since 99.68% of the time a firearm is used, it is not used to kill, yet a few dim bulbs claim that is the only purpose they serve.
So prove every crime involving a firearm a shot is fired and a death results for every shot fired, LOL.
We arent even including hunting, shooting sports, or practice.
Get back to us when you have a clue.
when axes are outlawed only outlaws will have axes
And Bush Jr. warned us all about the axes of evil... why didn't they listen???
Chinese are fascinated with axes, they are freely available, lethal, so there goes another senseless and fully preventable tragedy ...
I think id rather take a bullet to the head rather than an ax
Totally different situation. If he was able to get a gun the 13 that were wounded would be dead.
Or if one of the victims had a gun, the guy with the ax would be dead the the other 16 still alive and unhurt.
Doubtful t1. If we're going to speculate, in a situation like that he would have missed more with a gun than he hit with an ax. Who says he couldn't get a gun anyway, maybe he wanted to chop up little kids that day. Not all murders that were commited without a gun were because the nutjob couldn't get a gun. Funny how some of you seem to forget that these people are not thinking like normal people becaue they are batZhit crazy.
Guns make small holes (most active shooters are using FMJs that don't expand) they also require aiming, which is a fine motor skill. An axe on the other hand can be used to great effect by someone with no training at all, hacking off limbs and generally making the person attacked into a meat pie. You people always accuse us of affording magical status to guns, thinking that they're talismanic or phallic symbols or whatever kind of bullsh*t you cock suckers learned in women's studies 101, but you're the ones who don't understand either the capabilities or limitations of a firearm. We do. A wise man once told me "Shut the f*ck up unless you know what you're talking about" Maybe it's time for all you gun hating liberals to take that advice.
Is Islam spreading to China now too?
Except it is pronounced Iswam in China.
If you're crazy and you want to kill someone you'll use a gun, if they are banned you'll use a axe, if they are banned you'll use a knife, if those are banned you'll use your fist, if the goverment cuts off your fist you'll use your feet. Guns aren't crazy, only people who want them banned are.
Really? So the 11,000+ killed last year in America from guns is the fault of those fighting for stricter gun laws? Hmm, I didn't know that.
rbjk, If thats your argument then I come back with
788,558—that’s the number of deaths in the United States caused by medical errors and hospital acquired infections (HAIs) in 2009. That’s 33% of all deaths in America that year. To make matters worse, this has been the case for over a decade and no major improvements have been made to fix the problem. Add to that, data show "deaths" totaling 452,780 and "serious outcomes" equaling 2,816,297 occurred during the ten years from 2000 to 2010 as tabulated from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System for prescription drugs.
Comparing the five years (2001-2005) with the five years (2006-2010) finds that the number of deaths grew by +66.7% for the second time frame as compared to first. For the same comparative spans, serious patient leaped by almost three quarters (+77.5%).
Really? Your worried about guns when a doctor is 76x more likely to kill you than a person with a gun. But for both gun owners and the medical field there are no reports on how many lives they save a year. People saying that gun owners should be registered, licensed, go through training and be kept track of. Hmm...all that training, insurance, Board Certified, with big daddy FDA, US Public Health Service and each state with their own agencies overseeing our health care is proof more laws and government is not the answer. To me obama-care is way more risky to my health that they guy next door who owns a few guns. In 2010 there were 954,000 doctors in the US. There are an estimated 4 to 5 million registered gun owners with as many as 80 million people that own guns. So if you want to throw out numbers...lets LOOK at the numbers.
I think there's something in the water. Chop Chop!
The gun grabbers can read this with pride. No one was shot!
MSNBC should not have put this out cuz' all those democrats that read this will want to ban axes and hatchets.
But that should make the tree huggers happy because then all they will need to do is ban chain saws and hand saws. What will have for movies then?........people being spooned and forked to death? Oh I forgot they need to ban butter knives too.
Such a moronic post.
But isn't the right to bear axes and hatchets, brass knuckles, blackjacks, and the like, guaranteed by the Constitution?
This is what muhammed (I am not sure how to spell this gay child abusers name) ordered his Chinese followers to do.
I'll bet the Chinese will deal with this guy directly, no appeals.
Hope so,Short fair trial,public execution,his family to pay for the bullet to the back of his head,then pay for his funeral
What is it with China and day cares?
If these people are upset with they're govt, then they should have went to the nearest
court house and went crazy there. I cant possibly fathom why someone would attack children in such a violent manner. Their motives don't make any sense what so ever. The only explanation has to be that the kids were easy targets, f#@&ing cowards!
Think you answered your own question. azzhole did not have the stones to vent at a government agent,picked the children because they were easier victims.
3 kids dead, 13 wounded with some seriously so there could be even more deaths due to this nut job losing it and all everyone can do is make jokes. Because this man couldn't do well in business and life in general he decides that the best way to make it all better is kill children! I wish the guy had slipped and fallen on the ax before he got into the day care and cut himself so badly that he bled to death right on the spot, and yeah that's my anger talking as no child from any country deserves this to happen to them.
These were innocent children who did nothing wrong whatsoever. This world is seriously messed up and the way things have been going around the world I dought very much that it will ever get any better if not much worse.
I hope they allow all the children's mothers to have a go at this guy once someone sharpens all there finger nails to the point where there razor sharp, then allow the fathers a go at the guy with a tool of there choosing.
My condolences to the parents of all these poor kids may they all rest in peace.
This could just as easily happened right here in the US as well, so many people are losing there minds and this is what the results are.
Lighten up moron!
I like the way you think.
ill bet the chinese dont spend millions on a trial, defense, jailtime... it will be quick, and finished! ! ! !
you left winger liberals should watch and take heed ! ! ! ! !!
retiredsgt: That is why the Chinese Police captured the criminal alive. They know that he is as good as dead. Sometimes American police just go ahead and shoot them dead and avoid the time and expensive of a trial. Is there even an "insanity plea" defense in China?
Yeah, Obwama made him do it!
But don't worry, the iPhone 5 was released on time.
I blame the National Axe Association...
Determined to show that authorities were getting tough on crime against children, the court sentenced Xu to death after a half-day trial.
Thats the speedy trial. We need to adopt that in the US. Quit with all the appeals and crap. Save millions in taxes and time.
See, outlaw guns and there'll be no violence.
Thank you China, you suck.
-Detroit & Chicago
I don't think China need to change how they approach mental illness! Man sentenced to death after half day trial! I don't think there is much of an appeal process in China. At least not one that would keep an inmate on death row for 30 years after the fact!
And I thought Texas had the express lane for capital punishment!!
Diane Feinstein are you reading this? Get out you Ban- notebook out and start jotting this down. Assault axes must be outlawed. Did this axe have a pistol grip?
No but it sure had "evil" features....
It did look exactly like the axe's used by the Chineese military!!
I wonder if the victims are going to sue the daycare like the idiots in Colorado are suing the theater...