Villagers defiant as government creates new narrative

Afp Photo / AFP - Getty Images

Residents of Wukan, a fishing village in the southern province of Guangdong march to demand the government take action over illegal land grabs and the death in custody of a local leader on Thursday. Click on the photo to see more images from the village.

 

BEIJING – As the Chinese village of Wukan entered its fifth day besieged by a police cordon cutting off food and water from entering the village, reports from inside the cordon suggest villagers have continued to resist government overtures to end their protest.

What’s going on outside the cordon, though, is a very different story.

Even as Chinese and foreign press have begun sneaking around the security cordon into town – likely assuring at least temporarily that no draconian, military-style raid on the villagers occurs – Chinese state media have started to create an alternative and unverifiable storyline about what triggered the hostilities.


‘Official’ version of events
The China Media Project at Hong Kong University noted Thursday that late last night, the state-run China News Service reported on a press conference that allegedly confirmed that “preliminary investigations have ruled out external force as the cause of death” in the case of Xue Jinbo.

Xue, a village representative who was detained along with several other local leaders by police last Friday during a raid on Wukan, died in custody – alleged of a heart attack.

But his family was permitted to see the body and reported seeing fractures and bruising all over his body. And they were not permitted to take his remains home for burial.

However, the China News Service report said the town’s medical expert had shared photographic evidence of Xue’s body which refuted the family’s accusations that police beatings caused his death. The reporter was allegedly not permitted copies of the photos for publication.

Xue’s death and its suspicious circumstances sparked the mass protests in Wukan that eventually drove village officials and police out of the area earlier this week.

Another report from the China News Service said various Wukan village officials had been detained for discipline violations.

Afp Photo / AFP - Getty Images

Residents prepare for the funeral of Xue Jinbo, a local leader who died in police custody, in the fishing village of Wukan in the southern province of Guangdong on Thursday.

That no other local Chinese media – and certainly no foreign press – had reported on the press conference suggests that local government officials are engaging in what the China Media Project dubbed, “public opinion channeling” tactics.

In layman’s terms: they are dictating the narrative by creating only one plausible sequence of events.

The two separate reports are intended to get the following results:
1) Absolve local police of brutality and murder accusations – eliminating at least one of the reasons for unrest in Wukan.
2) “Detaining” – as opposed to arresting – Wukan’s senior officials demonstrate that the government is being pro-active against corruption, without officially conceding guilt. And it obfuscates the other central reason behind the villagers’ anger – illegal land seizures.

PHOTO BLOG: Chinese villagers defy government in standoff over land rights

Scapegoat a few
Another piece of the local government’s strategy to quell the unrest has emerged: scapegoat a few to spare the majority.

The Shanwei County government Thursday named two village leaders it claims are ringleaders behind the revolt and vowed harsh punishments for them and other protest leaders.

Wu Zili, the acting mayor of Shanwei County, accused two village leaders, Lin Zulian and Yang Semao, of actively spreading rumors and encouraging villagers to build barricades around the city. The mayor gravely warned that “the authorities will firmly crack down on anyone who organizes and incites the villagers,” according to Telegraph reporter Malcolm Moore.    
 
For longtime China watchers, the combination of the earlier local media reports, news that the government is attempting to negotiate a peaceful end to the standoff and Mayor Wu’s threat toward the supposed ringleaders are clear signals that the government is eager to bring an end to the conflict by providing an exit plan for the majority of Wukan’s citizens.

However, taking that path will come with a price: selling out the people the government has branded as ringleaders of the rebellion.

For at least one person, this is unacceptable. “Everything they said at the press conference [about Lin and Yang] is a lie!” said one villager NBC News reached by phone Thursday afternoon. “We simply elected those two to be our representatives.”

Villagers’ side of the story: Beijing will come to the rescue
Villagers in Wukan Thursday were actively working the phones, talking to the media who called in or slipped into town. However, as the world’s attention has started to focus on the events in Guangdong, they appeared anxious to push their own storyline, which is full of condemnation for corrupt local officials and deep-rooted respect for the central government, which they seem confident will come to their rescue.

“We don’t want any foreign press here! We expect the central government to come here and rescue us,” said another villager by phone, “We have great leaders in [President] Hu Jintao and [Prime Minister] Wen Jiabao!”

However, that sentiment is not shared by all. As one Wukan native told NBC, “If the press was not here, the police would come into the village and harass us.”

National implications
Whatever tact the local government takes in Wukan, the results could have serious implications for one man in particular: Wang Yang, the Communist Party chief of Guangdong Province.

With China poised to complete a rare leadership change next year, Wang had in recent years been positioning himself to compete for a promotion to the Politburo Standing Committee, which serves effectively as the nation’s top political body.

Having championed a “Happy Guangdong” campaign that he claimed would focus on improving the living standards in the province, Wang has instead found himself dealing with labor protests that have coincided with the economic slowdown in China. Public anger over rising inflation and fewer jobs has led to factory strikes and violence throughout Guangdong, which has been dubbed “The Workshop of the World.”

Now with open rebellion in what was once proudly referred to as a “model village,” Wang finds himself struggling to peacefully and definitively end the uprising – before it kills his chances of being elevated to the standing committee.

Until that elusive win-win resolution appears, expect the siege of Wukan to continue.

NBC News Producer Bo Gu contributed to this report.

Related link: Rebellious Chinese village under siege by police

Discuss this post

Take a good hard look America, this is where we are headed, starting with the passing of the defence bill today.

  • 13 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:04 PM EST

Oh Moheeheeko a round of applause.Couldn't of said it better my self!

Oblunder Head and his friend Andy the Whack Job Stern are planning exactly that.Look Andy's name up you'll get an eye full.

This Ass Hole Defense Bill is just the beginning.They're STRIPPING THIS COUNTRY with surgical percison, and these Dim Wits just lolly gag around and go along with this Treason not realizin g the boot is going to be to their ass.Then they won't be able to figure out what happened.

In that way these Government Criminals have everyone right where they want them.DUMMIED DOWN!

You don't need a foreign army to take over your country the Invaders,the criminals are right in your back yard!

  • 7 votes
#1.1 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:52 PM EST

Everyone on the hill can take blame for this, not just the POTUS. the bill recieved almost unanimous Republican support in the house, and held very little resistance in the senate.

Bottom line is bad things are coming our way, we cant just keep playing the red team vs blue team game that media keeps shoving down our throats. Thats how sh!t like this gets passed without so much as a whimper from us.

  • 14 votes
#1.2 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:08 PM EST

Occupy Wukan !!

.

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:36 PM EST

My thought as I got to the end of the article: "coming soon to a town near you."

  • 4 votes
#1.4 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:52 PM EST

Umm, I guess the fact that Obama has made a veto threat against this bill just slipped right by a few of you didn't it? Doesn't matter, I'm pretty sure that congress could get the 2/3 vote it needs to pass veto anyway.

  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:53 PM EST

Hey im unfamiliar with this defense bill, what is it called so i can research it?

    #1.6 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:07 PM EST

    H.R. 1892

      #1.7 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:48 PM EST

      You mean, war bill.

        #1.8 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:45 AM EST

        Hatefly,

        He dropped the veto threat when it passed through congress.

          #1.9 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:38 AM EST
          Reply

          Reminds me of New Jersey water front residents.

          CAN IT HAPPEN TO YOU?

          Eminent domain -- the taking of private property by government -- has become a hot issue this year. In June, the United States Supreme Court ruled that towns can take property from private owners and sell it to developers as part of larger redevelopment plans. The practice has become commonplace in New Jersey. (nj.com)

          • 6 votes
          Reply#2 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:38 PM EST

          Eminent domain has been around for ages. But only when it comes to the government (local, state, or federal) seizing property for infrastructure developments. That is to say, they want a new highway, and your land is in the way, you're screwed.

          The new thing is seizing property and then giving it away for private commercial development. The argument is that if the government decides the community needs a new commercial or residential sector, it's "for the public good."

          • 3 votes
          #2.1 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:05 PM EST

          I probably should have highlighted "and sell it to developers". Which will make profits for someone like Trump and the like, not the public directly, "if at all"!

          • 2 votes
          #2.2 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:29 PM EST

          And which presidents appointed the judges that made that decision? Stevens appointed by Gerald Ford. Kennedy appointed by Reagan. Souter appointed by George H. W. Bush. Ginsburg appointed by Clinton. Breyer appointed by Clinton. Ginsburg and Breyer were way down the list of people being considered but were viewed as acceptable to the GOP controlled Senate. The Senate was 55 GOP vs 45 DEMS. The GOP controlled the House under Clinton for 6 out of 8 years.During President Bill Clinton's first and second terms of office, he nominated 24 people for 20 different federal appellate judgeships but the nominees were not processed by the Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee. Of the 20 seats in question, four were eventually filled with different Clinton nominees, fourteen were later filled with Republican nominees by President George W. Bush and two were left open during Bush's presidency.During his presidency, Clinton also nominated 45 people for 42 different federal district judgeship who were never confirmed by the United States Senate. So Ginsburg and Breyer are pretty much on the GOP too!

          • 1 vote
          #2.3 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:51 PM EST
          Reply

          "Chinese state media have started to create an alternative and unverifiable storyline about what triggered the hostilities."

          Interesting that mainstream media like MSNBC or CNN talks about this with such incredulity as if they aren't state media themselves. What the Chinese state media should have done was take a lesson from American state run media and just blacked everything out, as MSNBC had done with Occupy Wall Street for 2 months, until they had absolutely no choice, or until they realized that people would find that news elsewhere, and probably in ways that were unfiltered by our own state media.

          • 5 votes
          Reply#3 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:58 PM EST

          Sounds a lot like what the mainstream media tries to do for the liberals here : "local government officials are engaging in what the China Media Project dubbed, "public opinion channeling" tactics."

          'Nothing to see here folks. just move along.'

          • 4 votes
          Reply#4 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:41 PM EST

          Seems to be why Ron Paul isn't getting a whole lot of coverage.

          • 3 votes
          #4.1 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:04 PM EST

          Mr. Spartan, in the last two weeks looking over everything from Mr. Cain dropping out to The Newts meteoric rise when in the past he was just short of run out of Washington, I started to wonder why this was so and it came to me that they (the liberal press) will crucify him with his past should he recieve the GOP nomination, and the conservatives will not be able to mount a good offensive,so, the main stream media will have Obama re-elected. With Mr. Paul being an "outsider" (due to lack of media exposure here in central New York) I started researching Mr. Paul and I like what I am seeing in the man. Any body know where I can get a Ron Paul bumper sticker?

            #4.2 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:36 AM EST

            Harley mike, the term liberal press is an oxymoron. There are 5 or 6 corporations that control 95% of the press in the United States. Corporations by defination are conservative, therefore, nearly all the press in the United States is conservative.

            • 1 vote
            #4.3 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:44 AM EST

            Harley Mike, I was pretty much in the dark about Ron Paul and like what i'm finding on him. if you want a bumper sticker he has them on his website. just look up Ron Paul 2012.

            • 1 vote
            #4.4 - Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:43 PM EST
            Reply

            Why do we care about which version of the story is fact. Fact has no importance in China, especially in Chinese history. Whatever is to your advantage is the fact.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#5 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:45 PM EST

            Remember Mr. Rich; "History is written by the victor."

              #5.1 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:39 AM EST
              Reply

              While i'm appalled at the Chinese ruling parties tactics for 'keeping civilians in line' and the manner in which they go about treating some of these 'rural communities', you really have to give them credit for the length of time they've managed to keep this, at times, inhuman charade going.

              They're lucky such a large portion of the population lives in rural areas as opposed to the more modernized coastal regions; otherwise these silly coverups would never work out.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#6 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:50 PM EST

              NDAA- -calling all 'villagers' between the Atlantic & Pacific oceans: ONE thing that separates you from what's going on in this particular asian village is: THE SECOND AMENDMANT- -utilize & revere this right- -We may no longer be the home of the free, but, let 'em all know that we still are very much THE HOME OF THE BRAVE!

              • 4 votes
              Reply#7 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:10 PM EST

              Chinese state run media, U.S. state run media. For now the truth can be found here, if you look for it. But it doesn't seem like it may last. And yes, everyone should look into the verbage in H.R. 1892. Your right to a trial as an American citizen is being stripped. Once "they" label you as a terrorist (sounds similar to the Chinese case, a threat) you can be held indefinitely. Frightening to say the least.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#10 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:18 AM EST

              So China really does have a Ministry of Truth.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#11 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:41 PM EST
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.