Burberry celebrates China as Beijing downgrades luxury...

BEIJING – For a moment, it felt like 2007.

“It’s the new China, and we’re the new face of Burberry.”

The high-end British fashion label hosted a splashy night out on Beijing Wednesday evening as part of its efforts to promote a younger face for the 155-year old brand and to celebrate its growing presence in China.

Adrienne Mong

Chinese models like Shupei strut their stuff for Burberry.

“I am so thrilled to be back here [at] this exciting time of China’s development,” said Angela Ahrendts, Burberry’s Chief Executive Officer, sounding an upbeat note reminiscent of the heady free-wheeling days leading up to the Beijing Olympics.

Ahrendts was on her way into the new Beijing Television (BTV) sound stage, where more than 900 guests—including celebrities, models, diplomats, businessmen, and VIP customers—were being fuelled by free-flowing champagne as they awaited the start of a digital fashion show and a live performance by Keane.

“This is the biggest, most innovative event we’ve ever done,” said Christopher Bailey, the label’s Chief Creative Officer.  The occasion was streamed live on the Internet via the company’s website and broadcast into self-standing boutiques around the world.

The decision to hold the event in Beijing reflects the importance of China to global purveyors of luxury goods.

Burberry – which currently has 57 stores in the country – plans to “open close to 100 stores in the next five years,” according to Ahrendts.

“It’s no surprise it’s one of the major growth markets in the world for us,” she said.  “It’s contributed a great deal to our growth.”

Adrienne Mong

Burberry plans to open close to 100 stores across China in the next five years.

Money money money
Luxury brands have long been smacking their lips at the potential of China’s consumer market – potential fed by regularly published statistics nurturing an image of hundreds of millions of hungry shoppers armed with fat wallets.

In 2010, China counted 960,000 individuals with a personal wealth of $1.5 million, up 9.7 percent from the year before, according to the annual Hurun Wealth Report 2011, published by a luxury publishing and events group in Shanghai.

“For most luxury brands, China – or the [mainland] Chinese luxury consumer – is number one,” said Rupert Hoogewerd, Chairman and Chief Researcher of the report. “Whether it’s number one in terms of market share or number one in terms of market growth.”

But it’s not just the super wealthy who are buying up high-end goods. 

A survey by McKinsey & Company last month showed that “the 13 million households comprising China’s upper middle class (incomes between 100,000 and 200,000 renminbi, or $15,000 to $30,000) offer the biggest growth opportunity…we expect to see 76 million households in this income range by 2015[.]”

Luxury sales, meanwhile, saw 16 percent growth in China in 2009 despite the global recession.  By 2015, they are expected to reach $27 billion, up from the $12 billion rung up last year, according to the same McKinsey report.

Which makes it all the more interesting that last month reports surfaced of a ban on the word “luxury” in advertising.

A ban on 'luxury'?
The Beijing Administration for Industry and Commerce on March 15 announced new guidelines restricting the content in outdoor advertising.  Companies were advised that they have until this Friday to vet their billboards and other outdoor ads to ensure they comply with the new regulations.

The very loosely-worded and vague circular focuses on “irregular content” and “irregular characters, words, and idioms.”  Specifics in the statement were given only once: “…including unhealthy political and cultural climate in outdoor advertisement, advertising hedonism, feudalism, pro-foreign sentiment, royalty, coarseness, vulgarity….”

Two days later, the state-run China Daily newspaper reported, “Officials will target advertisements that ‘promote hedonism’ or the ‘worship of foreign-made products.’”

The article then cites examples of words no longer to be used in ads: “supreme,” “royal,” “luxury,” or “high-class.”

Directives such as this appear to hamper attempts by luxury brand companies like Burberry to expand their presence in the China market.

But a long-time resident corporate communications strategist in Beijing argues the new ad restrictions reflect the central government’s concerns about class – not luxury.

The "nation's leaders are not prepared to allow China to become – or, more important, appear to become – a society divided by class as it was before the revolution," writes David Wolf.  "Allowing people to get rich is acceptable, as long as the Party can cling credibly to a claim that New China is fundamentally an egalitarian society."

Adrienne Mong

Members of Britpop group Keane pose for the cameras before their first live performance in Beijing.

China + luxury face an intertwined future
In the meantime, then, Burberry executives can merrily pursue their expansion strategy in China.

“China is not so dissimilar to Burberry,” commented Ahrendts.  Both, she explained, are “ancient” but driven by a young energy.  “The future of China and the future of Burberry honestly are inseparable.”

But let’s not get into a discussion about time.

Chinese officials, as it turns out, have issued new restrictions on that topic, too.  

Specifically, time travel.

The State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (SARFT) recently posted a statement on its website banning the use of time-travel in movies and tv shows, saying that the narrative device “disrespects history.”

But that’s a whole other blog.

With additional research by Bo Gu and Emily Ni.

Discuss this post

13 million households comprising China's upper middle class (incomes between 100,000 and 200,000 renminbi, or $15,000 to $30,000

This is why we're doomed to misery.

    Reply#1 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:26 AM EDT

    There exists something known as an exchange rate...

      #1.1 - Sun Apr 17, 2011 8:27 PM EDT
      Reply

      Luxury is only for the Party elite just like it was

      in the USSR. China's leader will fall someday too. And the US elite class too!!

      • 1 vote
      Reply#2 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:36 AM EDT
      Jobe.Deleted

      lol Greg. You sound like one of those con artists that claim they can predict the future and their prediction is so vague and vaporous that it can mean anything. 'Someday'. lol

        #2.2 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:47 PM EDT
        Reply

        The ruling elites say Do as I say, not as I do. Liberals are the same worldwide.

          Reply#3 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:49 AM EDT

          Lonnie,

          Liberals are the same... I think you mean conservatives - they demand the everyone uphold a certain value, while they do whatever they please... in the same vein as Gov. Sanford, Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, Dick Cheney, etc...

          • 2 votes
          #3.1 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:20 PM EDT

          The "ruling elites" are Liberals ? You have a funny definition of "Liberal".

            #3.2 - Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:01 AM EDT
            Reply

            The article cites China has 960,000 millionaires and 13 million upper middle class ($15-$30K/yr). China has 1,331,460,000 people as of 2009. Doing the math, that leaves 131,750,000 people making under $15K per year. For reference, our lower middle class here in the US starts around $25K-$30K per year (cite wikipedia).

            Not sure I see the market there for higher end brands, unless they plan to manufacture in China and sell a much lower prices than they do elsewhere. I'm sure there are other factors involved, perhaps cost of living or tax rates allow for more discretionary income from $15K per year than we might have in the US, but I doubt it is significant enough to allow for luxury spending.

            Ikea opened stores there and it appears that people only go there to take measurements to copy stuff, eat in the Ikea cafe or to sight see with the kids (cheaper than Disney World). These companies who take advantage of low cost labor to make huge margins in the West can't expect to make those margins from the people they under-pay in the first place!

              Reply#4 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:01 PM EDT

              In China, they invested heavily in public transit so that their people don’t need cars to commute or get along with their daily lives. Not having the need of car allows them to save a lot of money in expenses like car insurance, rising gas prices, routine car maintenances, car washes, parking fees, annual registration fees, etc. Imagine how much extra cash you’d have every month if you could go along without ever needing a car.

                #4.1 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:29 PM EDT
                Reply

                how can any foreign company do bussiness in communist china if they cheat by allow their own companies benefits i just think china should be forotten do not continue to make communist china powerful or we face such backlash of destruction. Commmunist are evil

                  Reply#5 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:54 PM EDT

                  Do you even know what a Communist is? And as for cheating... do you think companies in the United States -- the banks, investment companies, oil companies etc. that have been stealing billions and padding their executive salaries with tens of millions of dollars -- are any better?

                  People like you are scary... you shout headlines you read but you don't actually understand what you're saying. And it's your ignorance that allows politicians and business executives in America to continue lying and cheating.

                  • 2 votes
                  #5.1 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:36 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  The Chinese mandates governing the outdoor advertisements are hysterically funny.


                  If they had chosen words to define the opposite of all things luxury related, they could not have done a better job.


                  I do not envy those charged with creating luxury adverts in China, they will have an indescribably hard job to do to get the point of 'luxury' across to Chinese consumers.

                    Reply#6 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:15 PM EDT

                    I doubt it. They know what luxury is as well as the next person.

                      #6.1 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:49 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      The State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (SARFT) recently posted a statement on its website banning the use of time-travel in movies and tv shows, saying that the narrative device "disrespects history."

                      Raise your hand if you can imagine, let alone stomach, a world without Back to the Future, or The Time Machine (which gave us the idea of time as a fourth dimension).

                      "But that's a whole other blog" indeed. In the meantime, I await the CCP's smash hit, Return to the Tomorrow, starring Mikhail G. Feng and Christopher Liu (in 3D!).

                        Reply#7 - Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:09 PM EDT
                        youguiDeleted

                        Who would say know that China was not so far a poor country? it doesn't seem like that in the days we live. Luxury demand is growing and so is luxury advertising. Money means luxe, and China has many money...

                          Reply#9 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:03 PM EDT
                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.